I’m glad to see you are using recyclable packaging for your loaf.

Also very cute.

That second photo caught me by surprise… 😂

What a beautiful pup, with a fantastic smile. 💜

Oliver is a cutie.

Your anti-bait seems to have backfired, or perhaps you got exactly the response you were looking for. 🤪

Hey Jude!
You’re a good dog.
Take a long look at that moskeeter …

Aww, hi Moop!! They look so soft

That’s a wise face. 💜

Love the under-couch sploot!

What a sweet little tripod doing a perfect sit/beg.

Happy still go to work but get paid extra to be there day, to those that celebrate.

I’ve been meaning to join bookwyrm, but can never decide what instance to join, so I keep putting it off.

I think I see his halo!! 💜💜

Gus always makes my day!! Hope the dog park made his day. 💜

To himself most likely. Consider how a large vehicle can crush a small vehicle made to safety specs.

Now consider how it would go if the small vehicle was made of plastic.

I read that as “butterfly”, was confused. Reread it correctly, and still am.

Literally every time I hear news out of my U.S my brain is boggled.

Gus is the motivational inspiration the Lemmyverse needs.

Also, I love seeing these regular photos of Gus, thanks for sharing them!

This one is not AI, but when I’m unsure I like to do a reverse image search.

I think it’s good to be skeptical, but don’t lett it ruin your enjoyment of cute things!

Most AI is super obvious still, and even the subtle stuff has tells.

I believe you’re right. The image itself is pretty low quality, at least on my end, and I think that adds to the confusion.

I am not saying you specifically edited the image, but there may have been some brightening or color contrast adjustment at some point, which is what I meant when I said “enhanced”. At the very least there may be some image compression from the many times the same image has been shared since 2013… In which case I suppose that would be “dehanced”.

Not that there anything wrong with editing or “enhancing” images. All professional photographers do it in one way or another, and it has been practiced since the early days of photography.

I think it is important for people develop critical thinking skills in order to differentiate between A.I. and non-A.I. images. Far too often I have seen people believing the most absurd things are real. There is nothing wrong with people calling it out when they see something that doesn’t look or feel right— even if, as is the case here, we are wrong in our assumptions.

This is how we learn.

A reverse image search brought me exact results from as early as 2013, which is long before A.I. was creating images like this. I agree that something looks off about the image, and it’s definitely enhanced in some way, but I don’t believe it to be A.I. generated.

Or maybe sleep-post?

So cute!!

You should Xpost this to !dogs@lemmy.world