Yeah they were experimenting with 64bit exploitation when this signal handler got some focus regarding a (likely related) deadlock so they rushed to disclose their findings to the project to minimise the possibility of having eyes on this vulnerability
Hm ich hatte immer die gute “Ranz-light” Aussprache im Kopf
I guess it’s also my bad. After reading the text with a more neutral mindset it’s not that clear cut as I initially read it. My bs detector tends to get a bit sensitive when AI comes up and I interpreted the wording in the worst way possible.
The point being that tweets like the one in question are designed to do the opposite. They are designed to pull attention towards the knives and never to look at the leech.
I agree they are different things, I just wanted to object to this being an abstract problem. It’s a very practical one with very practical solutions. They do take time to implement though because it takes organised action.
Also, separate comment because it’s a separate thing. The analogy is actually perfect. We should be worrying about both things, the knife and the leech. The knife needs more immediate attention because the leech is actually pretty good at keeping it’s wound clean and not kill the host immediately.
The problem I have with the sentiment of the tweet of the bank is the very likely intended focus on just the one side of this issue. Part of why this is a long-winded social issue is because many people don’t take the time to analyse the situation more broadly. Because they have to deal with all the knives in their arms, and get reminded of yet more knives, that the leech can’t ever become the focus of the attention.
The leech is the company you are working for. Companies are getting away with paying you so little because you are removing every little expense that is still left in your life. Fighting for better pay is very much practical.
Mit über 1,25 Mio gehörst du wenn nicht ganz dann aber doch fast zu den obersten 1%. Laut bpb war die Schwelle 2017 bei ca 1Mio. Da kommt jetzt die Inflation von einigen Jahren drauf. Wenn man sich auf die obersten 2% bezieht (was ich jetzt nicht absurd finde) bist du da auf jeden Fall noch drinnen.
Wenn die “obere Mittelschicht” durch ihren Wohnsitz in die oberesten 2% rutscht haben wir trotzdem ein Problem und müssen etwas ändern. Auch wenn das bedeutet, dass die “obere Mittelschicht” dann vielleicht umziehen muss.
The thing is that the people you tell to stop buying their coffee to-go aren’t just bleeding. They are also being sucked dry.
The knife alone isn’t the best metaphor, but with an additional leech it’s closer to reality. And the doctor isn’t removing the leech he’s just removing the knife so you can still produce blood for the leech to suck out of you.
Also the doctor is paid by the leech to tell you how you can produce more blood but you shouldn’t expect to actually have more of it in your system. You see how hard the leech is working on extracting that stuff from you right? That’s basically a 24/7 job.
Kann anscheinend auch passieren dass das bei einem Umzug zwischen Bundesländern nicht richtig übertragen wird und du nochmal austreten musst. Weil das einfacher ist als die Ämter dazu zu zwingen untereinander zu kommunizieren
You have written tests for your code and now feel safe because your code is tested. But test quality is really hard to measure. The idea seems to be to introduce “vulnerabilities” (whatever that means…) and see if your tests catch them. If they do that’s supposed to show that the tests are good and vice versa.
As the first AI-based mutation testing tool, Mutahunter surpasses traditional “dumb” AST-based methods. Our AI-driven approach provides a full contextual understanding of the entire codebase,
This is where I call bullshit. The AST is a precise representation of the code which should be easier to analyse and modify instead of the raw text. If you only rely on processing the text I have a hard time believing your AI has a deep understanding of the contextual interdependencies of the different parts of the code.
Edit: it kinda does use the AST if one of the preconditions is a treesitter grammar? Maybe the marketing wording is just very unfortunate?
Im allgemeinen um nicht relevante oder besonders zu schützende Daten nicht heraus zu geben. Klassisches Beispiel ist den Namen von zuständigen Mitarbeiterinnen zu schwärzen. Wer sowas konkret bearbeitet hat ohne dabei Kontrolle über Zielsetzungen o.ä. zu haben geht ja tatsächlich niemanden was an.
Wird aber natürlich und offensichtlich missbraucht.
No that’s not the same. In one case there is only the theoretical possibility of help whereas in the other case there is a realizable possibility for help. This is a big difference.
On average it gets hotter by 2.5 degrees or less now.
Yes on average over a multiple decade period. This says nothing about how weather is going to change and it’s likely to change a lot. Extreme weathers are going to be way more likely anywhere you are.
I mean even if you aren’t old now you’ll be old eventually. And then the heat’s gon’ get you
Wie war das mit Menschen in Kriegsgebiete abschieben? War das okay oder nicht? Ich kann mich nicht mehr erinnern.
But if a private company does it, it belongs ti the private company.
Unless you don’t believe in private ownership?
“If I invented the means of saving lives that doesn’t make it my responsibility to actually do so. Especially if there are profits on the line”. Wow.
Germany has a beautiful sentence in its constitution:
Eigentum verpflichtet. Sein Gebrauch soll zugleich dem Wohle der Allgemeinheit dienen.
Property implies responsibility. Its use shall also benefit the wellbeing of the general public.
The thought being that while private property is a core staple of our society this is only the case because the concept of private property is seen as beneficial overall. If private property starts hurting the general public then the implied responsibilities coming with the property are not being fulfilled and the concept loses its value to society as a whole.
I really don’t get what you’re trying to say here. That’s obviously great. I am all for doing this stuff, how could you even think I wouldn’t? I’m saying both kinds of activism provide value.
(Aside from the fact that nothing really got damaged…)
Teile davon sind Suchtmittel, Sucht als Krankheit ist oft folge von Realitätsflucht, der Wunsch danach wiederum ist oft vorhanden wenn dein Leben Grade Scheisse läuft.
Kosmetikprodukte sind sehr vage da könnte auch z.B. Shampoo drunter fallen. Diese und Rasierklingen als Mittel zum sauberen auftreten sind in unserer Gesellschaft quasi Pflicht um überhaupt irgendwo Respekt zu erhalten. Das gehört zur Gesellschaftlichen Teilhabe die wir allen gewähren sollten.
Energydrinks und Kaffee werden von Erwachsenen meistens konsumiert weil sie in ihrem Leben zu viel gestresst werden. Zu lange Schichten, zu wenig Möglichkeiten zu schlafen, trotzdem schnell und zuverlässig arbeiten müssen. Siehe Paketdienste o.ä. diese Zustände sind auch gerade da üblich wo sehr sehr wenig verdient wird.
Die wenigsten dieser Menschen fühlen sich gut dabei zu stehlen. Ihnen ist klar dass sie das nicht tun müssen sollten sehen sich aber trotzdem gezwungen.