Eat the rich.

  • 0 Posts
  • 57 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2025

help-circle


  • Government contracts out everything to the lowest builder.

    This is not always the case. In reality, the bid often goes to the company with political connections.

    They might also look at things like timeframe and job creation. So, supposing that all other things are equal: One company plans to use robotic labor, one is using human labor. There’s going to be a lot of pressure from unions to hire the human labor. Or one company is using imported materials and the other is using local materials.

    That’s not to say that the system isn’t biased and flawed. It most definitely is. But this idea that the “lowest bidder” always gets the job is just not true.


  • It’s intentional, ofc.

    Horace Mann, the father of public education, was a Puritan. An exerpt from a little article about Horace Mann here:

    "It’s worth reminding ourselves now about the key characteristics of the industrial era, and how we can see them manifested in the education system that continues to operate across America to this day:

    • Schools focus on respecting authority
    • Schools focus on punctuality
    • Schools focus on measurement
    • Schools focus on basic literacy
    • Schools focus on basic arithmetic

    Notice how these reinforce each other. You enter the system one way, and are crammed through an extended molding process. The result? A “good enough” cog to jam into an industrial machine."


    But school isn’t just preparation the “industrial machine”. It also serves as a propaganda machine. The master of Nazi propaganda, Joeseph Goebbels, saw schools as a place to indoctrinate the youth. That’s the purpose of history class in public education. To build the mythos, to encourage loyalty, to tell stories of brave soldiers fighting the ever-present enemies of the state.



  • Depends on the job, but elected members of Congress get an incredible amount of support staff.

    First, they have a full team of staffers who can guide them through the legislative processes/procedures. Communications, press, scheduling, admin, secretarial - all provided.

    Second, they have support from their own party. Campaign offices, re-election staff, community outreach, all that sort of thing.

    Of course, they still don’t have time to read every single bill and understand the complexities. But the length of term doesn’t help for things like that. The length of term is more to let your constituents decide whether you are doing your job. A vote of confidence/no confidence.

    And, an underlying reason for short term limits is balance of power. One chamber of Congress (the House) is filled with an ever-changing cast of “average Joes”. The other, more prestigious house (the Senate) is filled with power brokers and career politicians.







  • Giggle. We’ve been playing “wait and see” for a decade now.

    Elections don’t solve this. We’ve seen that high-level Democrats are no different than high-level Republicans. Biden refused to investigate the Epstein files, he refused to prosecute Trump, and he refused to target gerrymandering/election interference.

    There’s no version of this where the old America magically returns. That’s the same logic trap that ushered in this entire mess. There are plenty of MAGA who truly believe that they are shaking up the system and that just one more election will solve everything.

    THIS. IS. THE. FUTURE.

    We are living in it. The trajectory is set. We didn’t stop militarization of the police when they stepped on our rights. We didn’t stop data collection when we were warned. We didn’t stop gross financial mismanagement, corporate influence, gerrymandering and all the other things that make a democracy work.

    We aren’t living in a fascist takeover. That happened years ago. We are living in its aftermath. We are frogs in a simmering pot, watching the bubbles float past us and wondering how to turn off the heat. It doesn’t matter now, the damage is done. The momentum takes control.








  • I can’t speak for what actually happens, or what even what SOP in the armed forces might be in this situation.

    SO…I googled it. Here’s the levels of complexity involved in a Tomahawk missle strike:

    1. Command and Authorization (Top-Down Flow)

      Authorization: The process starts with a decision by the President, often passed through the National Security Council to the Secretary of Defense, and then to the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Command Channel: The Joint Chiefs convey the order to a regional commander (e.g., U.S. Central Command or Indo-Pacific Command). Execution Order: The regional commander transmits the target information and engagement requirements to the specific launch platforms (ships or submarines).

    2. Transmitting the Order to the Specialist

      Secure Communications: The order is sent via secured, encrypted digital communications to the vessel’s Tomahawk Strike Coordinator (TSC) or equivalent senior operator. TTWCS Integration: The data is directly integrated into the Tactical Tomahawk Weapons Control System (TTWCS) on board. Mission Planning: The TTWCS allows the crew to plan the route or receive pre-planned, digital target coordinates, known as a Missile Sequence Number (MSN) task.

    3. Action by the Specialized Operator (Launch Team)

      Mission Assignment: The firing platform’s operators receive a digital tasker, which includes primary and sometimes backup assignments. Validation: Specialists on the bridge/combat center verify the target and launch authorization. Targeting Data Entry: The TTWCS is updated with the new target data, which may include GPS coordinates. Block IV missiles can be reprogrammed in-flight, but the launch command requires pre-defined parameters. Launch Sequence: The operators execute the final launch sequence, which involves the missile being ejected by a solid-fuel booster from the Vertical Launching System (VLS).

    SO, at which point should the crew have refused the order? Where does the blame lay?