As soon as it becomes infeasible to read every comment, downvoting to disagree creates echo chambers and encourages groupthink.

Are you downvoting to disagree or are you downvoting because it’s not contributing to the conversation?

90% of the American hockey players I know are conservative. I bet the majority of the players loved this.

The last few months I’ve had a constantly changing and active homepage but for my subscriptions and on all. Lemmy is the real deal.

Do you purposefully misspell his name?

I know plenty of Millennial and Gen Z Trump supporters. Don’t blame this on lead poisoning because the problem isn’t miraculously dying with the Boomers.

We should be really quiet and polite while these guys actively destroy our country from within.

What’s about the other twelve multi-billionaires that are worth more than $85B? Why were they left out?

Disco Elysium had me laughing out loud a few times.

You’re giving the right fucks. UBI for all.

Those neolibs aren’t without fault though. Abstainers and protest voters got us where we are today.

Sorry about your experience but I’ve been hearing about his mental/physical health decline since probably the day he was elected. The Trump era has been seemingly hours from over every day for the last ten years.

I’ll believe it’s over when he’s gone.

And, unfortunately, at this point I feel like MAGA is actually bigger than him.

It’s escapism. If it’s not for you, that’s fine.

Both Microsoft and Nvidia are multi-trillion dollar companies.

It was difficult, but not impossible to get one at launch. Prices on the secondhand market are also not as inflated as we saw with the PS5 launch or even the original Switch.

I managed to get one preordered and felt lucky in doing so but I think I would have managed to get one in person had I not gotten a preorder.

It was nowhere near just as bad as other launches. Not even close.

Hence the desire for SteamOS.

That’s OP’s claim.

No it’s not.

OP’s claim is that cults give nicknames. Not that all entities that give nicknames are cults.

But your second statement makes me realize that you likely have an inherent bias that is preventing you from seeing the logic involved.

Of course not. It is your interpretation that having a nickname implies cult membership that is the logical fallacy.

The argument is:

• If CULT, then NICKNAME
• i.e. If X, then Y

Your interpretation seems to be:

• If NICKNAME, then CULT
• i.e. If Y, then X

Which is the logical fallacy of affirming the consequent.

LOGICAL FALLACY - AFFIRMING THE CONSEQUENT.

If X, then Y does not imply if Y, then X.