sadly, no. Anticheat Systems are designed to be paranoid as fuck. So even some readout of the hardware used that WINE handles a tad differently than Windows might trip it.
sadly, no. Anticheat Systems are designed to be paranoid as fuck. So even some readout of the hardware used that WINE handles a tad differently than Windows might trip it.
Because… why would mass murderers lie? That’d be naughty, they would never do that!
Even the sketches from up north are presented sadly and a tad depressing
“oy, where’s my change?” “What change?” “For the money I gave you” “Besides payment for your 10 Dollar Lemonade special offer, I didn’t get any.” “But the sign says 1,50!” 1And a nice day to you, too" “Wait! I want my…” “I said: A nice day, Sir.”
Es gibt “drängeln” und “Vorfahrt nehmen” und dann gibt’s “Stadtbus-drängeln” und “Stadtbus-Vorfahrt nehmen”. Die ersten beiden sind leichtsinnig und dumm, die anderen beiden lassen Rambo vor Angst erstarren.
I mean… Have you tried?
How are you getting change?
What good is cash gonna do if the networked cash register doesn’t open anymore?
Oh, you actually believed that story? Whoops. Sorry! It was actually me who ate your Cheetos and downed your Vodka.
It doesn’t. It will require you to reboot for every god-damned line of code that has changed.
Na, nothing. Did an update today. Nothing bad happened at al, Because why would it?
standing on the shoulders of giants.
See, Netflix? You don’t need to ramble on for two seasons to tell a fucking Story.
Many of the machines in question will have safe mode walled off for security reasons anyway.
I really have a hard time deciding if that is the scandal the article makes it out to be (although there is some backpedaling going on). The crucial point is: 8% of the decisions turn out to be wrong or misjudged. The article seems to want us to think that the use of the algorithm is to blame. Yet, is it? Is there evidence that a human would have judged those cases differently? Is there evidence that the algorithm does a worse job than humans? If not, then the article devolves onto blatant fear mongering and the message turns from “algorithm is to blame for deaths” into “algorithm unable to predict the future in 100% of cases”, which of course it can’t…
But you are only allowed to report things that seem important to Americans in any community that might be visited by Americans. Come on, everybody knows that.
/S
I got a toddler at home. I’m very familiar with their product range :P
In a country that has neither got anything to do with Trump nor with the shooting… Someone needs to pamper a certain voter demographic, I’d say
aber gut auswringen!