Everyone’s talking about the mad cow part, but this is also a really excellent point:
“Some of these people trying to define the future of humanity, creativity, or whatever it is using AI, are not the most humane or creative people. So they’re sort of saying, ‘We’re better at being human than you are.’ It’s obviously not true.”
It’s not a personal attack
And I took that personally!
How could i know what you do in your spare time? You haven’t shared it until now. I can only go off of what you’ve said on this thread, and I do not retract my criticism of it. This will be the last response, so I hope you have a good day and thank you for making a difference in the world.
I can understand that perspective, but I also think you’re making a lot of assumptions about whether this was effective or not. Based on your original comment you don’t know, so I’m just encouraging benefit of the doubt instead of shitting on things for not being perfect.
Maybe as an activist yourself you could get in touch with this organization in the post and suggest some more effective methods for what they’re trying to achieve? That would be practicing what you’re preaching instead of just leaving comments online. Just my 2 cents, and I wish you well.
I say this respectfully, but has making negative comments about people trying to do good and educate others ever improved the situation?
I think it’s easy to be jaded right now, I struggle with it myself, but remember that this kind of knee jerk criticism is very deflating for some people to read. You might feel like it’s an outlet for you, but it can cause others to feel hopeless and depressed.
I don’t believe you want that, so I would encourage you to be more supportive of attempts at change, not just results. Changing hearts and minds is a long and imperfect process.
This seems like a really smart thing to do. Meet people where they are.
I also enjoy the fact that things like this probably make these massive corporate platforms sweat a little. People always find ways to subvert and I’m here for it.
This is something I’ve wanted to see explored a lot for years. Excited to see a big studio trying it.
So let me get this straight… They’re still burning money on Concord through legal costs? Just walk away guys.
I’m from the area and this is a really big win. We’ve had a string of terrible mayors beating promising progressives, so this is a long time coming!
It’s hard to overstate how insanely fast these games get made. I have no doubt that the project managers have to cut any corner they can to meet the release schedule. Don’t take this as a defense of the result, but rather a criticism of the treadmill dev cycle for these games.
How much you wanna bet in around 6 months to a year there are headlines about them hiring loads of people to cleanup the mess.
I felt the same way. I turned it to easy mode and enjoyed the visuals and story. Good riddance to the combat frankly.
See, CS is too far for me. Every weapon being a nearly instakill and no respawns just isn’t fun for me. I’ll give it to you that it’s even simpler though.
I’m not average I’m sure, but I buy 0 games a year at full price 😅
They’re a very pure and straightforward shooter experience with a lot of polish. I don’t think it’s that weird.
The level of monetization is totally unhinged at this point, but there’s a good game buried underneath it all.
Is this for the PC only version too? I can’t tell through all the marketing speak.
Do you know how to program, or are you trying to learn? That’s a big factor in what I would suggest.