The idea features heavily in the widely read AI 2027 doomsday scenario of last year, which imagines AI agents designing more and more intelligent versions of themselves, one of which eventually kills all of humanity with a bioweapon in order to make room for more datacentres and solar panels.

Fucking lunatics

Yes, just like Israelis will own to Palestinians for a long time. Do you disagree? Just because Israelis became evil, does not somehow delete history of Nazis. This is obviously less about Israel and more about holding parties accountable for what they did, instead of forgiving everyone at the first inconvenience or “an enemy of my enemy is my friend”

EDIT: Of course, just downvote and move on, because you know I’m right and you cannot rationally argue against this, unless you’re also ready to forgive Israel as soon as Palestine attacks someone else.

Are you having comprehension problems? I’m literally speaking against genocide(-s) in my comment. The fact that it got upvotes on Lemmy probably goes to show it. Context matters, yet you jumped to insulting me like a teenager. I’ll make my own assumptions about you.

Huh? I’m like at the opposite world of Israel and you can probably scan my comments for that stuff, doubt you’ll find me showing much support for a genocide.

EDIT: Actually, read my profile bio. It might have been due to questioning the numbers from early Lemmy days, but that’s pretty much history and in no way makes me a zionist, but someone who critically sees information that’s hard to believe and I usually need more proof than a reddit/lemmy comment.

Trust me when I say this - many of the folks don’t even really understand Nazis. The symbols have nothing to do with them, it’s deeply enriched in our cultural heritage way before Nazis stole the symbols. One of the most respectable/known things from history in my country is “Order of Lāčplēsis”. Look it up, notice the dates, and then look up when Latvia was founded. The people who held the title were also involved in fighting against Nazis.

This is all verifiable online. Sometimes the East European history and culture is not what you can assume from GoG emails. We very much hate nazis as they literally brought us into wars and occupations, just like we can assume Poles are not very happy about Nazis attacking them and wrecking their country for decades.

You know what’s really annoying? That we essentially get hated for our cultural heritage because the baddies stole a symbol

Let me remind you that Nazis saw slavs as subhumans, next in line after Jews. Poles and Latvians are slavs

As an Easterner, I fully agree with that highlighted comment from Polish dude - the symbol you see in the title has nothing to do with Nazis, it is cultural heritage that we still use around.

For us it’s different, but idea is the same - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ugunskrusts

Better don’t go to India

Let me remind you that this is Polish game and GoG is owned by a Polish company.

EDIT: I… don’t honestly understand the downvotes. Do you like not believe me and Wikipedia?

EDIT2: I’m assuming people somehow assumed I’m talking about runes, when in reality I just wanted to elaborate on local cultural heritage (the sun-looking thing in the game’s logo, not emails)

https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/forums/geforce-graphics-cards/5/583738/dlss-5-faq/

DLSS 5 will be optimized to run on a single GPU for release.

DLSS5 would fail if they required two cards, and nVidia knows this.

That brain has tiny PP hehe

Not really. You’re thinking of Nvidia test bench, and they always go overboard. 5070 was already confirmed to support DLSS5.

Why does US feel the need to compete with China? It’s going to play out just like when Soviets tried to keep up with the US spending

DLSS has always been local. I’ve never heard about anything cloud-related when it comes to DLSS. The DLSS5 demo was also local.

I actually think DLSS5 isn’t that terrible and part of the reason it was so hated was because of “AI”. I see it similar to graphic mods or Ray reconstruction (DLSS 4.5), just another tech. Don’t like it? Don’t use it. Me, on the other hand, want to actually see this happen in real-time, one day. I imagine we could even see proper filters in the future (like this).

No, they sued as an answer against Valve’s threats and actions, nothing really to do with customers, but Valve using it’s power to dictate how they can sell their product in a way that does not create competition against Valve.

It’s literally called anti-trust lawsuit.

EDIT: Honestly dude, I think we should just agree to disagree and finally end this convo. You’re obviously not convincing me and I’m not convincing you, so it’s a dead end of back and forth.

It’s literally what lawsuit is about, but okay.

…

How can I not blame Valve when they’re the reason others can’t compete in pricing? Why are you not getting this?

This is not what I’m talking about. I agree with you, and anyone can choose whichever platform they want.

The discussion is about how Valve Corporation uses it’s status for anti-trust practices which is a major blockade for other companies to compete with steam.

Like I said, as long as this keeps happening, others can hardly compete and gamers don’t have a reason to use other platforms.

Ubisoft wants so sell cheaper on Uplay to pull traffic there. Why not just simply dump Steam and ONLY sell on their platform? I’d really like you to answer this question.

Steam has major market share and it’s not a good business decision to ignore that, so publishers are forced to submit to Valve’s rules, unless they’re ready to take the loss.

In a fair world, all these publishers would likely sell cheaper on their own platforms, which is good for you, the customer, but that won’t happen with Valve setting rules, and so there is no reason for customers to make a switch, and so other platforms can’t compete.

Epic gained some traction by giving away free games, but that’s basically the best they can do.

Ask yourself - how can any other company be competitive in the current environment? How would you even go about building your own platform when the very basic thing (pricing) is basically regulated by the big guys?

But if you even for a second think Epic would not impose 30%+ fee if they had Steams market share

Don’t you see how you’re accidentally proving my point here?

Yeah, if you want to sell on THEIR platform then follow THEIR rules. Like wtf?

I don’t think I’m capable of convincing you that this is anti-trust competition practice enabled by near monopoly, which is bad. You would not get such stupid rules from Epic or GoG.

I guess the only thing I can say is that be glad that current CEO of valve isn’t as bad as other CEOs, but it won’t stay like that and it feels like we’re slowly creating a monster. All corporations, without exclusions, should be kept in check

Instead of just, I don’t know, release a competitor

And now we’ve gone full circle and came back to Valve anti-trust practices, the ongoing lawsuits and their status of near monopoly. Like, you literally cannot do that if you want to sell your games on steam too.