That’s some solid reframing, bro 👍

Panik: your Debian stable system is so ancient it still contains the heartbleed bug.

Because when you press save, it saves the gimp project. It makes sense, because you’re working on a project in gimp, and that project has to be converted to a different format for use as an image.

It’s like expecting MS Word to print the page when you click save.

I mean that is basically what people’s UI complaints usually boil down to: things are in different places than where I’m used to.

So you have to fiddle with the volume less on vinyl?

That’s the one good selling point I’ve heard for vinyl so far.

🫏

The donkey is the closest there is to an ass emoji.

That user base is a drop in the ocean compared to most of reddits user base, and those people have all left already.

The comparison in this case is operating on the word half, not on the subject of the sentence:

Only half want to get married, even less [than half] want kids.

This is a contributor post, not a Forbes official article.

I read here recently that the rich people who pay attention to Forbes for investment information avoid all Forbes contributor content and focus only official article from Forbes staff.

I don’t know how true that is, but if you believe it then until a forbes staffer writes about it in an official capacity, it hasn’t actually hit Forbes.

Before tablets, parents didn’t survive.

The target being the executives who will approve the marketer’s work.

So the developers claim, but the users still encounter it, and the bug report stays open for 22 years … possibly more.

So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing?

Removed by mod

So what are they doing that illegal that other apps aren’t doing??

I really don’t know how to be any more clear with this question.

I read the article too, and those things you quoted sound to me like things every app does.

Hence my question: what is different here?

There’s not a word in this article about why this breach of privacy matters while others do not. It’s not stated whether this was in the terms of service for the app, and whether those terms were ruled against.

All kinds of apps have been selling personal information for a long time, and it’s been ruled before that it’s allowed if they have the proper legalese in the terms of service. Did this app just not have any terms of service?

Why is it a breach of privacy for this app, but other apps doing the same selling of personal data is not?

You forgot the part where we all return to poverty so the rich can stay rich in the face of climate change.

Easy fix: don’t offer support

More expensive easy fix: contract with a call center in India to do “support” for you.

Maybe $100. Almost all of the upgrades were printed. I bought an all metal hotend and a glass bed. I think that’s it. Probably more like $70.