You are learning which is great.
You are learning which is great.
For those horrible enough to like this.
Sometimes each other too if my information is correct. So even if you are a bad person and want to harass innocent people, kiwi farms isn’t the place to be.
Bad people are bad people towards you too if you give them the chance. Just don’t be bad, much better. Don’t hate!
I know an easy fix. Just don’t do ai.
Vanilla might not be good in a lot of things… Ice cream… Se… But here it is pretty nice!
I can’t test it right now but I would love to know. Is it true?
I think the biggest flaw is the name.
energy would be used by the Linux guys. That energy is probably equal or less than what the turbine produces. That makes it not a perpetual motion machine. It is free energy for the owner though as long as the speakers don’t consume too much energy as the Linux guys will come and for free to no cost of the owner
I hope these aren’t real. I, and most people here, could probably write these codes top to bottom on paper without an eraser or strikethrough parts because we have it fully solved before the interviewer finished the sentence.
Not a criticism of you but a little fun fact about him for others, he has a bunch of friends who “aren’t” Nazis but calling themselves or have friends who like to call themselves stuff like “race realist”.
I will start to call chrome/iums limited web browser from now on
While I love the meme, Linux is doing pretty good recently
Just In case, I wasn’t clear, I am just relaying the argument as I understood it
Following an ideal while being based on free labor is difficult
It doesn’t seem to be a debate. “Microkernels are better” “yes but I don’t have the time for it” but thanks
Thanks! I will look into
I have heard that before in a joke setting, I would love to hear genuine arguments for and against it.
I tried to express my understanding of the arguments. I don’t know and I couldn’t argue either case to a point that it is worth adding to the conversation
I understand your point and I want to make clear that my own opinion is not in favor of systemd or against systemd. I am very much neutral. I just expressed my understanding of the arguments. But I welcome the discussion.
The argument is basically that it does too much and as the motto of Unix was basically “make it do 1 thing and that very well”, systemd goes against that idea.
You might think it is silly because what is the issue with it doing many things. Arguably, it harms customization and adaptability, as you can’t run only 2/3 of systemd with 1/3 being replaced with that super specific optimisation for your specific use case. Additional, again arguably, it apparently makes it harder to make it secure as it has a bigger attack surface.
There isn’t a legal precedent. Unless I misunderstood, this is a settlement and settlements aren’t! Legal precedent. Which is why big e.g. pharma likes them, because then they don’t have the legal precedent for the next case.
I love borzois but lol