Which reminds me of that old joke: “but you fuck one coach…”
Edit: just spotted my typo… I’ll leave it in😊
Which reminds me of that old joke: “but you fuck one coach…”
Edit: just spotted my typo… I’ll leave it in😊
Well, that’s been the basis for some other products. AMD and Intel comes to mind😊 They both have IP the other need and historically Intel has been the dominant one, but now the tables have turned somewhat.
Exactly. His followers expect there to have been an audience and those fictional people should have been crazy about it…
And to make it worse, they are none too concerned with facts to begin with.
AI content, AI bots in the forums, AI telemarketing, AI answering machines, AI everything. AI will make IRL and stuff like audited national encyclopedias important again. Gone is the promise of the internet. And this is the real reason why anonymity will not be possible online. If we can’t identify the poster as a human, it will mean nothing…
Well… Its built on statistics and statistical inference will return to the mean eventually. If all it ever gets to train on is closer and closer to the mean, there will be nothing left to work with. It will all be the average…
So “it was only a joke” is also back on the menu? Wow, times are rolling back fast!
Even the term itself is a generalising stereotype. But it we are to have a somewhat serious discussion about it, I’d say It’s a human condition, not a gendered condition. For example, given what is (not) known about our respective genders, you felt the need to explain this.
So stereotyping gender is back on the menu? Are hair color jokes still taboo?
An LLM once explained to me that it didn’t know, it simulated an answer. I found that descriptive.
Totally unlike the other fielded armies globally at the moment.
/S
No, we need to be able to keep two thoughts in our heads at the same time or we are bound to repeat the mistakes. Terror and oppression is terrible regardless of what the purpetrator and the victim are called.
Oh my… Last time I read pieces like this, the new architecture was called bulldozer.
It needs to be low, but positive and keept stable. If it’s to high it will be self sustaining and increasing, if it’s negative everything stalls. 2% seems to fit the bill.
There could be an argument that 4% would have been just as good, and had the rest of the world united on 4% it would*. However, it would not have changed anything in last year’s combat of inflation. The target would have been defended just as fiercely causing just as much collateral. Only the numbers would have been slightly different.
*Ignoring for a bit those countries that has had to fight to keep inflation up.
I’m not entirely sure how to phrase this, but… Today there are choices…
Well, frankly, Northern Maine isn’t very much north and not enough inland to get the extremes?
Most of Scandinavia has been below -15F for a good part of the new year and being relatively dense (for Scandinavia) in EV coverage I’d say Norway is the best example of EV very cold weather performance.
We’ve had this same “debate” here as well with ice-owners lamenting the perceived loss of range and EV-owners responding “I know, don’t care. Always works, always warm and always topped up”.
I never said anyone did, i was just reminded about a joke describing how some actions overshadows other activities when retold among peers.