Ideal would be them not reversing a decade of energy savings in the name of AI, but yeah, if they’re going to do that anyway then Nuclear is one of the better options.
Ideal would be them not reversing a decade of energy savings in the name of AI, but yeah, if they’re going to do that anyway then Nuclear is one of the better options.
I don’t think there’s a good guy. Both parties suck here.
Yes, and ChromeOS is built from Gentoo. That doesn’t mean much, the end user experience is worlds different.
Mostly that it doesn’t work on Steam Deck. Hits memory limits IIRC.
€2m? So basically free?
Harsh words for someone who continues to be their client
Fedora 40 doesn’t have to be a lot of fun to watch the kids without a taskbar poor guy is a bit of a lot of people
I think the interesting thing about project 2025 is how specific they get over the plans. It’s not just what they want to do, it’s a plan for how to do it.
I mostly agree, but it would be nice if it was a bit faster to be able to use it for web browsing. I still like reading long form articles and such but navigating and scrolling isn’t very viable yet on e-readers.
That’s such a weird claim
I’m pretty confident he’s not physically capable of that anymore.
Of course.
Yep. I’m Linux at home but macOS all day at work. My employer won’t let us use Linux workstations (despite everything I work on being Linux…). Both are vastly superior to Windows.
As someone who works fairly extensively with all three major platforms… You’re definitely wrong about macOS here. Almost everything on GitHub that works on Linux also works on Mac, aside from GUI applications which are often more OS dependent. The readme pages often just lump Mac and Linux together as they can be pretty similar, especially for things written for interpreted languages (python) where it’s often literally the same.
It would allow them to do HDMI FRL also, which is probably what you mean when you say HDMI 2.1. AMD cards also do HDMI FRL I thought. FRL is what allows things like 4k120Hz (higher bandwidth modes). The VRR that the Dock does is the VRR standardized with 2.1, which is why it works on TVs and devices that do not support freesync (see: LG TVs).
Anyway, the Dock doesn’t have a fast enough HDMI converter to do that. It’s not a licensing issue. Next gen Deck/Dock will probably do it.
It does not have a better sensor. The 50mp sensor in the 9 is vastly superior to the 64mp sensor in the 7a.
Actually it works fine on Steam Deck. It uses VRR over DP to the dock, which then translates it to HDMI with VRR. The dock has proprietary firmware to do this.
Intel and Nvidia hardware with open source kernel drivers also do a similar trick where the HDMI part is in a firmware blob. Only AMD does not work with HDMI VRR.
Right. And the regular 9 has the same main camera as the 9 Pro, thus my answer that it is definitely better than the 7a.
No. The regular 9 has the same camera as the Pro, if you mean the main camera. You just miss out on some of the other ones.
I’m fairly confident “rustls” should be “rust language server” if it stands for anything…