

limitations of linux
I’d look at it the other way around - why go to a platform that has marginally worse performance, while also making you deal with the limitations of Windows.


limitations of linux
I’d look at it the other way around - why go to a platform that has marginally worse performance, while also making you deal with the limitations of Windows.


No TQ Christians?
Yes and no. You could, in theory, put it behind a reverse proxy, but you shouldn’t without further security measures.
You could put your server in a tailnet (tailscale, there are FOSS alternatives, but those are more difficult to set up), which is extremely, easy to configure, and allows every device in it (smartphones, tablets, computers…) to access your media server.


You can pirate this game, like pretty much any denuvo title, due to the new Hypervisor bypass.


If the people you want to have access have static, exclusive ip addresses. Which is pretty unusual, these days.

?
I think you might be confusing the columns there. Firefox is listed as project using Ai, Librewolf and Zen are listed as ‘alternatives’ (a bit silly, since they are soft forks, but whatevs). Neither seem to be listed for LLM usage.


I’ll be interested to see their implementation, though it likely won’t replace matrix for me.


It is, and that makes it much better than Discord, but currently they’re mostly building another monolith on the central instance. Self-hosting doesn’t mean much if the communities are all on there.
I’ll wait for federation, hope it comes soon. Till then, I see more potential in Matrix.


In my eyes, the only sensible way of building such a platform at scale is having it be federated. Otherwise you can host a server - and if you’re unlucky, might need accounts on five servers to access all the groups you want.
If their federation implementation comes relatively prompt and is workable, that’s great. If not, it feels like a way to bootstrap a centralised alternative to discord. Pre-enshitification discord, but it’d again be up to a single entity whether it stays that way.
I don’t mind paying for hosting, but I don’t want to jump from one centralised platform to the next.


They are selling a subscription. It isn’t really a donation if you pay a set price for services.
I’d also hold out to see their federation implementation before considering them as viable as matrix.
They do seem better than stoat, though.


I could do a lot of things I do on the daily on my phone. But it would be more finicky and annoying. I have automated pretty much all regular maintenance my PC needs long ago. I just don’t see what I’d get, except for more janck.


Some of those might be less prevalent depending on where you are. But yes, there’s a lot of things to keep in mind.
Also, the plastic card thing is neat, I did not know that.
I’m especially annoyed about how easy it is to traci Bluetooth devices. I seem to remember that newer devices can rotate macs, but all my headphones are too old for that. And I kinda don’t want to throw away good hardware.


I’ve never used Rocky with a DE.


Cloudflare also has one that gives you some more data than Netflix’.


We wouldn’t want any Graphene OS device to fulfill the requirements necessary to be certified. That would make it useless.
‘Rooted’ doesn’t mean rooted, it means the Google API it checks against says no. And is unlikely to say yes on any device that isn’t ‘official Android’, with Google Apps having System access.


I use Graphene. There is some banks that do tap-to-pay independent of Google Pay, but not mine. There is one legit good thing about modern tap-to-pay - it cycles card numbers, making it harder for retailers to track you.


Didn’t Vivaldi? I don’t really use them cause I mostly avoid non-FOSS software, but I seem to remember them announcing they’d be keeping support.


No, the red flag is being ‘self-hostable’, but trying to concentrate all your users in a central, non-federated, monetised instance.
Also, we cannot verify how long they where in development because they squashed their git commits. There’s usually no good reason to do that.


I host two homeserver, one on synapse and one on continuwuity, both pretty small (tens of users), but with users in lots of large rooms. The second one was significantly easier to set up, and uses a lot less resources.
Also, element and element X work, but aren’t great. It depends on the user, of course, but I don’t think you get people by giving them the ‘dumbed down’ version.
I think you might have misread my comment. I was saying the feature only just gets to the same performance, while using it means having to deal with Windows.
If you mean the incompatibility of some anticheat titles - I think kernel level anticheat is an unmeritted level of system access, so I wouldn’t use them either way.