Yes, that looks exactly like what is happening. For clarity though it is a LinkedIn script not one uploaded by a 3rd party.
It seems to apply to links sent in direct messages which are routed through a linkedin internal page, I assume so they can track you out etc.
It was more the principal of it though, I hadn’t considered that the link shown in the status bar could not be the link you would be taken to if you click it but I guess that’s part of allowing javascript to run.
Sorry, I don’t mean the link text itself, but the destination shown in the status bar in the bottom left of my desktop browser.
Sorry for the slow reply, but it was a link on LinkedIn and I’m using chrome. It’s frustrating as I use the status bar to check the link is the same as the text before clicking it.
Schools have a duty of care to their students and there are plenty valid reasons to not want your face on the internet. E.g children who have been adopted from abusive families, threats made to children or their parents etc.
You can be polite about it and not confrontational. Just tell them that you’re unable to provide further information on it at the moment, but that you need them to take any photographs of you off the internet and refrain from posting anything in the future.
Let them fill in the blanks with whatever story they want.
How hard is it to keep one brand associated with the one thing they do well? I’d understand it if you only have one brand your trying to expand, like Spotify starting to add video content. But when Google own a wide range of apps each with their own brand and identity, they really don’t need to get everyone in one place like YouTube.
YouTube for me will always be about short video. When they stopped letting my buy movies on Google play, I didn’t start using YouTube and just use Amazon now. When they stopped music, I didn’t start to use YouTube music and stuck with Spotify. And now they are stopping Podcasts, I won’t move to YouTube. I’m not that bothered but I don’t see why they keep doing it, they must hemorrhage users every time and surely the value of YouTube with all these extra features etc is still less than the potential sum of the original parts.
Glad I’m reading this on Lemmy. Well, “glad” isn’t the right word, but you know…
I always check the status bar but I actually noticed the other day on LinkedIn or maybe Facebook, that the status bar said one thing, but the link was different,
E.g the hover over said https://website.com but the actual link was something like https://linkedin.com/linkout/wbdjdhgaj?user=xhedb
Just double checked and this also happens in Firefox. I think the other user in this thread has explained it well, looks like a JavaScript intercept onClick to prevent the link action and instead call a JavaScript function to open a different link.
In this case it is built into the site so I guess it is OK on the basis that I am trusting LinkedIn to not do anything malicious but it was more the principle as I had previously looked at the status bar to confirm the link was what I was expecting but in the future I will be more wary. Interestingly, right clicking and selecting “copy link” does actually copy the page which is loaded as opposed to the one on the status bar.
If you have linkedin it seems to be links in direct messages if you would like to see yourself.