Winter_Oven

oh my what did I even read

Not the one you replied to, but I would like to say that you make a solid point, it is good enough to say 90% of games.

Buuuut I would prefer being told 89% of top 1000 instead.

the words from the void strikes again

Apologies for the side track, but I must quote this:

the breasts that gave them sucke

Weeellll…did it really turn into a full-fledged browser just by needing Deno now ( for the JS challenges, from what my brain matter can understand) to download YouTube vids?

Plus, pretty sure it still works for other sites without Deno as well.

It really is, I would like more info on the ash tree hanging.

Exponential lasagna??

Boys, I think I know how to solve world hunger

Somebody get that catgirl distro in here.

Need to slide and collect all the 10 brain cells I have to one side to process the shit I’m looking at.

the source of the gremlin’s power has been revealed

DISCONNECTED

“You thought you were installing Mint, but it was me, Arch!”

oof

oh wow…that pic’s a throwback. Was always shit at the dancing without the extra ui help. How in the world was I suppose to catch their hand signals in time?

Imagine if people could choose what country they’re browsing from.

I think maybe an update to the image format standards, where it like somehow includes a hash of the instrument that has taken the photo and video, and thus, only such media that can be verified to have been taken by a physical instrument can be used in like legal matters, or reporting or journals.

Either this hash can be verified by some algorithm, or maybe the media could depend on this hash in such a way that the media is corrupted if it gets altered.

…wait, games don’t have even a single person checking for cheaters, even casually? Like, they wholly rely on anticheat?

(PS, has been a decently long time since I played a game that needed anti cheat)

Hmm, I would like to add on a couple of points to you reply (against your reply, now that I reread it):

1. I feel that he really was 100 percent in opposition against the movement, no?
2. About the movement, the creator of the movement also agrees that the movement can most probably not be applied to current games today, as it can be unfeasible for the exact same points you say, he wants it to be applied to future games being developed, by having the end of life of games be considered right from the beginning of games.
3. Moreover, about the legislative part of it, doesn’t a petition not need to deal with the exact legal wording? I belived petitions to be more like “hey, this is what the idea is, and this many people support it”. More like a letter to like actual law makers that this is a problem, and we need laws regarding this problem. Then the clear and robust arguments for each of the (very valid, of course!) problems and caveats you mention will need to be clearly articulated by them.