CEO: okay. You’re replacable anyway. Bye.
CEO: okay. You’re replacable anyway. Bye.
Totally approrpiate, since they’re terrorists endangering the well-being of everyone and the planet. Wait…
Probably has to be renamed to “ClosedAI” then.
Mein schwarz-druckender Laserdrucker widerspricht.
Avocados > Children
Oder will jemand ernsthaft […], dass sich jemand mit einer ansteckenden Krankheit in eine Arztpraxis kommt, dort mangels Termin stundenlang im Wartezimmer sitzt, und alle Welt ansteckt?
Wenn mir das Leben und Wohlergehen meiner Mitmenschen egal wäre, würde ich aus Protest wahrscheinlich genau das sehr ergiebig und freizügig tun. Doof bloß, dass ich niemand Unschuldigen deswegen gefährden oder leiden lassen will.
Wer solche hirnrissigen Politiken schiebt sollte echt mal in der Haut der Betroffenen stecken.
Wenn es Dir gerade nicht ums Geld geht, sondern, um Bio vs. Nicht-Bio, dann kannst Du trotzdem Oatly o.ä. kaufen, wenn Du weißt, dass die an sich biologisch anbauen. Der Grund, warum Alpro und andere Oatly-Produkte keine Bio-Kennzeichnung erhalten ist aufgrund der zugesetzten Nährstoffe wie Kalzium zum Beispiel. Obwohl das sinnvolle Zusätze sind, dürfen die Produkte deswegen nicht mehr als “Bio” deklariert werden.
I’m more with you regarding Israel. However, the context here is China, not Israel.
Also, it’s quite telling that you see nazi germany getting “fucked in the ass” by Russia as something bad.
Wtf. You know it’s 2024, right? Nazi Germany is no more (unless AfD and consorts form the new government).
I was not talking about WW2-times.
“Funding aggression”. Lol. No wonder Germany got fucked in the ass by Russia and China so many times with such bootlickers among the voting population.
2024 - 22 = 2002.
So probably not nazis. No.
Man könnte sagen, sie sei wegen aktueller Wahlergebnisse begestürzt.
Richtig. Denn sie wissen wie du dich fühlst. Und darin findest du Trost.
“-a” ist typischerweise eine weibliche Endung.
My point is, that the following statement is not entirely correct:
When AI systems ingest copyrighted works, they’re extracting general patterns and concepts […] not copying specific text or images.
One obvious flaw in that sentence is the general statement about AI systems. There are huge differences between different realms of AI. Failing to address those by at least mentioning that briefly, disqualifies the author regarding factual correctness. For example, there are a plethora of non-generative AIs, meaning those, not generating texts, audio or images/videos, but merely operating as a classifier or clustering algorithm for instance, which are - without further modifications - not intended to replicate data similar to its inputs but rather provide insights.
However, I can overlook this as the author might have just not thought about that in the very moment of writing.
Next:
While it is true that transformer models like ChatGPT try to learn patterns, the most likely token for the next possible output in a sequence of contextually coherent data, given the right context it is not unlikely that it may reproduce its training data nearly or even completely identically as I’ve demonstrated before. The less data is available for a specific context to generalise from, the more likely it becomes that the model just replicates its training data. This is in principle fine because this is what such models are designed to do: draw the best possible conclusions from the available data to predict the next output in a sequence. (That’s one of the reasons why they need such an insane amount of data to be trained on.)
This can ultimately lead to occurences of indeed “copying specific texts or images”.
but the fact that you prompted the system to do it seems to kind of dilute this point a bit
It doesn’t matter whether I directly prompted it for it. I set the correct context to achieve this kind of behaviour, because context matters most for transformer models. Directly prompting it do do that was just an easy way of setting the required context. I’ve occasionally observed ChatGPT replicating identical sentences from some (copyright-protected) scientific literature when I used it to get an overview over some specific topic and also had books or papers about that on hand. The latter demonstrates again that transformers become more likely to replicate training data the more “specific” a context becomes, i.e., having significantly less training data available for that context than about others.
They do indeed forbid it.
Deuteronomy 21
Oh man, religions are batshit crazy.