• 2 Posts
  • 217 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 9th, 2023

help-circle



  • Some of the complaints are valid, but their solutions are just as baffling as their targets.

    It seems evident that they’ve either got a case of cognitive dissonance flowing out their ears, or they’re dishonest in their motivation.

    In any case, you’re right, it is weird to point the finger at valve, especially since they’ve done so much for gaming as a whole;

    • Proton: should speak for itself. Carves games out of M$'s gated community.
    • Platform features: workshop, discussions, groups, guides. Fucking amazing.
    • Family sharing: nobody asked for it, and it seems like a bad business move - Valve did it anyway.
    • Index: great piece of tech. Too bad about the price tag though.
    • Deck: fucking masterpiece. Blows Switch out of the fucking water.
    • Support staff: fucking legends. I’ve had multiple interactions where they have breached their own policy to keep me happy,
    • Privately owned: despite the incentives to cash out and make bank. They have a fucking spine, which makes them dangerous to other platforms.

    This guy claims to be a long-time developer and modder, yet suggests Game Pass is better for preservation than Steam. If that’s their industry insight, no wonder nobody at Valve took their feedback seriously.


  • Reposting my comment from the other post:


    Stores should only provide DRM, and anything else that they do must be optional.

    But earlier:

    I would rather pay a fraction of the price to play a game for one month than pretend digitally distributed games have the lifespan of a boxed physical product.

    So, DRM is bad… but acceptable if it’s only DRM?

    If DRM is a critical failure point for game preservation and ownership, then a store providing only DRM is still part of the problem.


    In lieu of even the simplest commitment by Valve… Game Pass represent far greater value to consumers.

    Game Pass is the epitome of temporary, self-updating, DRM-heavy software that you can’t patch, mod, or preserve. Yet it’s presented as a solution?


    Valve does not expect users to delete their account; they think… nobody will ever hold them accountable.

    Then:

    They claim that upon deleting your account, your community posts will remain and will be attributed to [deleted], however this is not true…

    Wait, isn’t it contradictory to say they didn’t expect users to delete accounts while criticizing their policy on deleted accounts?


    Because the Steam client patches itself… their DRM prevents running Windows 98-era games on original hardware.

    That shit is 25 years old. Does this goober really think it’s reasonable to expect support for an obsolete operating system?

    Also, is this really a steam-only issue?


    Valve’s… design deliberately hooks and blocks access to those APIs as part of Steam Input’s initialization.

    This is typical behavior of API abstraction layers.

    If Steam Input replaces lower-level APIs, that’s exactly what it’s designed to do. Epic, Microsoft, and others do the same. The difference is the option to disable it - not the architectural behavior itself.


    In summation: This dingbat is a walking contradiction with an axe to grind.












  • Zozano@aussie.zonetolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldA cyberpunk anime girl!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    You’re erring on the side of caution, and I get the impulse. But there’s a fine line between giving voice to the unheard and drowning out the current conversation by crusading on their behalf without actually checking whether they wanted a champion in the first place.

    Language isn’t static, and if people who would’ve been the target of a slur no longer feel targeted by a modern, benign use of the word, maybe it’s worth listening to them instead of getting stuck in etymological guilt.

    This is essentially justification for tone policing, language gate keeping, or inventing offenses that marginalized groups themselves aren’t actually calling out.

    Campaigning on their behalf looks less like allyship and more like self-importance wrapped in a savior complex.


  • Zozano@aussie.zonetolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldA cyberpunk anime girl!
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    “The pejorative nature kind of got lost somewhere along the way.”

    Not according to some, who I’m surprised havent descended into this comment section yet.

    It genuinely amazes me that some people learn of a racist origin and immediately crusade against it, on behalf of people who dont give a fuck.

    Words change. When the majority of people are using a phrase in a benign manner, then dragging the racist origins back into the light is a really dumb way to fight against bigotry.

    Guilt tripping people into adapting new phrasing isn’t just arrogant and patronizing; it’s counterproductive - it makes the actual fight against racism seem petty and performative.




  • Zozano@aussie.zonetoAnimemes@ani.socialBased
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Depends how you want to define PoC.

    The author is fair skinned, like most Japanese.

    So this quote does kinda come off as fetishistic.

    Here’s the kicker though - who cares?

    Author of a manga likes brown girls. If that bothers anyone, go find something worth giving a fuck about.