![](https://sh.itjust.works/pictrs/image/2d4b79a1-47ee-489b-bded-02d92ed9edaf.webp)
![](https://fry.gs/pictrs/image/c6832070-8625-4688-b9e5-5d519541e092.png)
Doubt
vintage champagne socialist 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈
Doubt
What Saudi money? The Saudis already had 5% of Twitter and rejected Musk’s offer at 54.20
Bibi got played, all his goons were in the West Bank.
How do you change leaders during a war cabinet?
Apparently, people creating new accounts seem to assume the word (password) in the box in light gray font is a suggestion rather than a label.
lol
Thank you 🙏
Is the subject of greedflation news?
Yes but. Spreadsheets used to be done by hand, yet we still have bookkeepers
Exactly, change the leader or change the leader
Thanks for posting, I’ve been looking for a no code option
The whole industry is toxic, mentally and environmentally.
deleted by creator
Ah ok. Yeah they just did a thing to replicate it recently. Not sure if that means there was a period when that ability was lost though
https://dpnetwork.org.uk/international-data-transfers-data-bridge
Ok, I think I get where you are coming from, but your conclusion still doesn’t argue the original point imo.
The GDPR law on the UK statute books is the exact same law as the EU one, it has not been amended. It’s just that the ECJ is no longer the highest court. The UK supreme court is again supreme following brexit.
Please provide an example of where the EU has taken action successfully against a conpany that has no base in the EU though. I’ve not seen anything like that bef
The original point was that the UK was somehow in a worse position because of brexit, this is not true. The UK is no weaker legally because of exiting the EU. The law is identical.
deleted by creator
The judgment, issued by the three-member tribunal at the First-tier Tribunal, agreed with Clearview’s assertion that the ICO lacked jurisdiction in the case because the data processing in question was carried out on behalf of foreign government agencies.
Yeah, I’m going to take the judgement as the truth over your opinion of a fictional ECJ judgement, especially as the UK GDPR law is exactly the same as the EU one.
Please provide a link that shows otherwise
Therefore, if you conduct business with EU citizens, you must comply with GDPR."
They weren’t conducting business, as the article says. If they were, the law, in the UK, which hasn’t changed, would apply. But they weren’t.
I’m not… Just replying to EU supremacists who think their laws rule the world, they don’t.
And who haven’t read the fucking article which clearly says other EU countries have tried taking them to court, so the fucking moron who said it wouldn’t have happened if the UK hadn’t left the EU is clearly talking shite, as are all the other fucking morons who upvoted them without reading it.
[End rant]
That includes you…