That’s pretty darn weak.

I’m still not seeing a specific accusation.

If you wish to accuse me of any of that then you will need to be specific.

Otherwise, well, who’s the fascist now?

That’s a semantic argument about the salute. It makes no reference to nazis. You have nothing.

But nobody apologized for nazis.

You are like one of those little bugs that make noise at night. But instead of a melodious cheeping you just go “nazi nazi”.

It’s also the Roman salute, which predates nazis and fascists.

And you gotta admit, it’s a powerful gesture.

Also, he runs a company that makes spaceships. Which is pretty awsome.

Think about that while you work your shitty 9-to-5

Yes of course.

But by what method or algorithm does this DECENTRALIZED SOCIAL MEDIA system protect us from propagandists and censors?

What is a method in THAT?

Distributed tagging and voting? The grace of our benevolent moderators? Something else?

I mean, combatting propaganda and censorship is the #1 issue here.

How do we protect ourselves from propagandists and censors? Large, small, popular and individual.

The foundation of the common subculture is knowing who it’s ok to hate.

You just belong to the wrong subculture. Otherwise it would make sense.

Just say it. It’s easy. I mean I assume it’s easy. Asking me to pick through your “meme” is ridiculous. Just state your dumb accusation already.

I know because I know what the medium is like. I have that perspective.

Oh good lord, is it the tiny text at the top? I’m just not seeing it.

How about you just tell me.

I’m sure it was deeply fulfilling. Or some relative equivalent thereof.

And what hearsay am I accused of believing?

There is infinitely more to human interaction than a stream of symbols and images. Trust me on this.

Actually they are more honest. It’s harder to lie. And easier to detect lies. And the repercussions for lying are greater. This makes for less lying.

And that’s without bringing actual firsthand experience into the argument.

No, social media is good for many things, but it is ultimately just a child’s cartoon. A ghostworld.

Just state it plainly. Succinctly. Clearly. Then there will be no room for uncertainty.

I’m really not understanding your argument

Your leap of logic is rather tenuous. Can you rephrase?