blaue_Fledermaus

Parsing user input? Nonsense data coming from an API?

There’s the problem that “Evangelical” is too broad a category, there are churches that historically are considered Evangelical, but don’t share in that anti-christian insanity.

Dankeschön!

Es tut mir leid, Deutsch war meine erste Sprache, aber ich habe das meiste vergessen und lerne es immer noch neu; ich habe das nicht verstanden.

Wohl eher “aber-ka-*schi*”.

Ich komme aus dem Süden Brasiliens, und wir nennen die wilde Sorte “Ananas”, die normale Sorte ist “Abacaxi”.

My state is a large poultry exporter, and neighbors the one with the outbreak, weird that this isn’t on the news here.

And chased merchants out of the temple while brandishing a whip and kicking down their tables.

Without login

The numbers actually seem reasonable…

South Brazil. My city does have a reasonably OK bus system.

Talking with a taxi driver recently I asked how was competition from uber and he said that there was no competition, “those kids” using uber would be going by bus otherwise.

They are “media transformers” and might be useful if limited to it.

Knowledge retrieval certainly not, as “they” know nothing besides how likely one data fragment is to appear near other data fragments.

Not false, I also don’t like it, but I’m not wrong.

Pedro II put Brazil well on it’s way to become a global superpower.

The only one that came somewhat close was later Getúlio Vargas, but he was an asshole cruel dictator.

Maybe Lula in his first and second terms might deserve a distant third place.

I don’t disagree, but still better than all the other leaders the country had.

The following dictatorship put up a lot of antimonarchist propaganda, but still today abolishing slavery is celebrated by all as an achievement of his government.

(Note: I’m not a monarchist)

In Brazil the monarchists get some sympathy because emperor Pedro II was the only competent and halfway decent leader the country ever had.

Yes, certainly!

But I think there’s a difference between corrupt hypocrites not practicing a “reasonable” theology, and a corrupt theology supporting a corrupt practice.

There are those that care, but the nature of actually following it means doing it quietly and without seeking recognition.

Heresy then?
It’s a biblical interpretation framework based on giving theological significance to the order of the books in the Bible, ignoring previous history of theology and history of the formation of the Bible.
Theology is one the oldest sciences, it has Method; Dispensationalism throws it away and does it’s own thing.

Just to note: these books are heavily based on dispensationalist pseudo-theology.

But I agree that trump is an Antichrist

Why this controversy now? Tools like StyleGAN could do this for years already.