So where does the clampdown on anti-genocide speech land wrt this?

Thr UK has the same thing as America

Do they? I wasn’t actually sure. I thought the government was cracking down on anti-genocide speech.

On the one hand this is how it’s supposed to work. Free speech as a legal concept in the U.S. only protects you from the government…

…on the other hand it would be really helpful if there were a list of companies that were firing folks for being critical of Charlie Kirk…

…you know…for reasons…

Chad wife?

Probably because A. NYPost and B. What’s the difference between “getting eyes on the baseless claims” and amplifying the baseless claims?

Before and after they tried to remove it only to further bolster the message

It means Banksy, who has remained anonymous for more than 25 years, could finally be unmasked as he would be required to publicly disclose his name if brought to court.

Gonna be hard to bring them to court if you don’t even know their name, isn’t it?

The Democratic governor has publicly questioned whether the state has the authority to regulate federal law enforcement

My guy - you’re just the governor; not a judge. You don’t have to do the fascists’ job for them.

deleted by creator

JFC - please be sure you really want to see it before you click.

I’m in shock

I guess that’s a different court case than the one where Anthropic offered to pay $1.5 billion?

The thing is if all parties find the terms agreeable it doesn’t matter if it’s legally binding.

It’s more like putting a price on the shelf at the grocery store. Not every one will agree the price is agreeable and you might still get shoplifters but it doesn’t mean it’s a waste of time to list the price.

I think the idea is that all parties would find it beneficial:

Leeds told Ars that the RSL standard doesn’t just benefit publishers, though. It also solves a problem for AI companies, which have complained in litigation over AI scraping that there is no effective way to license content across the web.

I would assume creators and published would agree to those terms in advance (moving forward of course).

…especially if you can ensure “we” get the benefits and “they” don’t.

I just wanna say, if they don’t want to work toward the unkept promise of American, they can be the ones to give up the symbol; I’m not giving it up.

I grew up in a state with open primaries and no state party registration and recently moved to a state that has “semi-closed” primaries.

I think it’s fucking weird that you have to register a party affiliation with the state. Luckily “semi-closed” here means if you don’t register then you can vote in either primary. I can’t imagine why you would register a party affiliation when it only reduces your options.

I guess it’s easy to win a culture war where you’re the only belligerent

deleted by creator

I can practically hear the “HWAAAK!!!1!” From here.