It’s close enough that I can barely see the difference. It’s not just different layovers, times, airlines, and seating, but mix in different prices for the same exact purchase depending on the website, time, date, or maybe even browser cookies and it’s a lot more like an adversarial negotiation than simply selecting the best choice from an array of options.
Tbf booking sites are mostly pretty bad in my experience, and haggling has been there since…Priceline? Heavy JS, poor sorting, different prices, hard to define what you’re looking for. It could be worse, but it’s not great.
Oh no, not quality and craftsmanship!
What a strange time to be alive.
It takes 7 seconds for the terminal to load on my brand new laptop. I’m sure there’s some way to fix it, but that…just enrages me.
And it’s dog shit too.
The US military is not for national defense, it’s a pay pig for a handful of corporations.
When civilians want something, it’s always “those poor corporations!”
At least with the bill focused on military you can put forward the importance of “combat readiness”, “supporting the troops”, “taxpayer dollars”, and other things that politicians often say they care about.
They are examples of complex and difficult tasks that humans are capable of when working together, implying through comparison reordering society is also achievable.
The worst person you know is still just a meatbag, same as anyone else. Jeff Amazon himself has no power but what others, operating within one weird system, grant him.
Problem is we let the pricks run things, or we become the pricks ourselves.
Trick is figuring out how to stop both those things from happening. Must be tricky, given how it keeps happening. But we’re a clever species. We landed on the moon, took pictures of the backside of our star, spilt the atom, etc. We can figure out good economics and governance.
Move fast and break things, but it’s a passenger vehicle on a public road.
Oh it’s Towers of Hanoi. I have a screensaver that does this.
Once again trying to do a good redstone in Minecraft. But mostly just mine and chill.
‘I can’t explain [why we think you shouldn’t include these characters in your one-woman play]. And frankly, I’m quite baffled that you don’t understand.’
Okay but if you can’t explain your position, why would you assume others can understand your position?
They’re probably already in the data set of whichever LLM they use to write their policy documents anyway, so sure, fine. 🙄
I mean, you do, but… Often you just attest citizenship. Not sure if it’s checked on the backend or not. And illegal immigrants often have SSNs, just not their own. That’s how they can work much of the time.
Not that I expect many non-citizens are voting. The risk to reward ratio makes it really unattractive. Even citizens struggle to bother.
Without seeing the studies, it’s hard to know if they were good studies that support her position or not.
I mean they should have given him credit. That’s what they owe him (all they owe him) under the MIT license.
This is an excellent policy position, if only the argumentation wasn’t dogshit. I am begging everyone even vaguely lib-left, stop writing like this. If you’re trying to write a petition, open letter, or public statement, for the love of god write it for people other than yourselves or just don’t say anything at all.
Internet censorship is bad for alphabet people, but it’s also bad for the straights. It’s bad for everyone. It’s just bad.
Freedom is for everyone. And Heritage wasn’t coming to the parade anyway.
I for one am celebrating the Trump administration’s commitment to ending US military hegemony.