![](https://lemmy.world/pictrs/image/85154568-8abf-47b0-9339-431ac70b8dab.png)
![](https://lemmy.ml/pictrs/image/h1ChnLuBHr.png)
+1
I don’t think it shows any ads.
+1
I don’t think it shows any ads.
This is really weird phrasing that pretends that Israel has no responsibility for their actions.
They chose to do this, they are responsible for what they’ve done.
Clearly they mean that they want the growth to be “sustainable”, not the company…
From the article:
The bad news is that the 6 GHz wireless spectrum uses shorter wavelengths. Short wavelengths are great for fast data transfers at close range, So, they’re great for connecting to your Wi-Fi 7-enabled HDTV a few feet away from your router
With a range that short, you’re not going to be doing much roaming around. It obviously has some use cases, but unless you need to be streaming data it doesn’t make a lot of sense.
The example we are discussing in this thread is transferring data off of a high res/high performance camera. For many situations this can be done after filming is completed, in which case a cord still makes a lot more sense. Hence my joke.
For live broadcasting it could be useful, but the range still seems quite limiting.
And the external wireless data transfer pack can be connected to the camera by a long thin piece of metal. Maybe we could call it a “cord”. And why stop there, it could be disconnected from the camera when you’re not transferring data.
Yeah, wireless Android Auto is great, although I’ve noticed that it’s fairly battery-intensive.
I’ve only used it on rental cars. My own car says that wireless Android Auto is supported, but I’ve never gotten it to work, and I think the on-screen message saying it should work is actually a bug. Probably because they have the same (or very similar) code running on newer versions of my car which do support wireless Android Auto.
This phrasing
offsetting everything else your kidneys are filtering
sounds like a negative thing, at least how I’m reading it.
I know drinking too much water is bad, but was under the impression that drinking a lot of water is generally better for you.
I saw the post yesterday, but didn’t watch the video at the time.
Your comment convinced me to watch it, and, boy, was that more interesting than I expected.
One question remains: what are those gloves they are wearing? I get that it’s something that helps with the rolling technique, but is it just for abrasion/chafing prevention? Or does it do something else?
In 2023, the most talked-about game of the year was a CRPG with turn-based combat
What game are they referring to? I like turn-based games, and would always love to find another good one.
Which, unfortunately, is far too often. In my recent experience…
deleted by creator
Why is this “news”?
Just don’t go on Xitter and you won’t have these “problems”…
My only problem with Oppenheimer is that they should have issued earplugs upon entering the theater. Shit hurt my ears.
Like, I get that bombs are loud, but I don’t need to actually feel pain and probably damage my hearing to get the picture.
It would be awesome if someone had been querying it with the same prompt periodically (every day or something), to compare how responses have changed over time.
I guess the best time to have done this would have been when it first released, but perhaps the second best time is now…
C#
Exiting with a cool ~$9m. Not too shabby.
And since he’s been there since before the IPO, he’s probably done pretty well for himself, regardless.
Most of my personal communication goes through Signal, but I still get a ton of SMS messages.
Real useful stuff…
Hey, if it makes you feel any better, Netflix started blocking me from sharing an account with my parents, and we cancelled the account and didn’t make any new ones.
Although, if they still had disc deliveries, my parents would probably have kept the account.
1000 unique listeners.
If you had 500 die hard fans who stream your music every waking minute, you get $0.
Now, I imagine they did this to prevent people from trying to game the system (create a song and have all your devices stream it all the time, or something), but it’s still shitty that if you have legitimate “listens” you can get nothing.
The title is a bit weird. On my first reading it makes it sound like two different people can have indistinguishable fingerprints. But after reading/skimming the article+paper, it seems like what they’ve actually done is been able to correlate fingerprints from different fingers on the same person.
So the title makes it sound like they’ve weakened the basis of fingerprinting as forensic evidence, when in fact they’ve developed a way to link the different fingerprints from the same criminal so that additional cases could be solved.
e.g. if a criminal only left a thumb print at one crime scene and an index finger print at another, this posed a problem for investigators because they couldn’t link them to the same person, but this “AI” approach can link those two different prints to the same person.