True but it also depends on where you go. In Canada for example, this detail is explicitly taught to anyone who goes through the process of getting a firearms license.

That is interesting, I’m curious what the payload is.

Unless it’s a shotgun firing birdshot. This is why in many places you can hunt birds, it’s really the only type of firearm you’re allowed to use, because when shot at an upward trajectory, the pellets do not maintain enough velocity to be harmful when coming down and harmlessly fall to the ground. Anything rifled though is a different story, because its that spin on a bullet or a slug which allows the projectile to maintain its velocity and be dangerous when coming back down.

Then invent the technology that makes what you want to do reasonable, otherwise don’t blame a drill for being incapable of hammering nails fast enough for you.

Because they don’t want to face that their multi million/billion dollar investments are not going to pay off.

Ok but hear me out, what happens if you inject it into your feet?

Perhaps consider investing in a small UPS device as well, it might help out in any future events like this.

So the debate is about what words mean, but when asked to examine what any dictionary defines those words as to understand and agree upon their meanings, you fold immediately?

If the debate was about this, and I offered this to you, then if we follow your anecdote, it was actually me who lead you to the pacific ocean but then you decided to sit on the beach instead of swimming.

I guess you don’t believe your argument is predicated on facts in that case since you dropped it the moment you were faced with scrutinizing it against a reputable source.

Goodbye.

Go through a dictionary of your choosing and post the cited definitions of:

Ad hominem

Character

Attribute

Idea

Attack

Stupid

Intelligence

And I’ll prove to you by your own cited definitions why you’re wrong without going outside of the definitions.

I trust Merriam Webster if you do.

You know what? That is actually some sound reasoning and I think that is an acceptable response.

I intended my original comment to be more a a shot at google than yourself, but I can see why you came back with what you said as a result, and then I got salty about it so I apologize.

Please go ahead and explain what the difference is between calling a person stupid and calling a persons ideas stupid, given stupidity refers to a persons intelligence by definition.

If you call someone’s idea stupid, then by definition, you are calling them stupid by extension because that’s what that word means.

If used in a colloquial manner I can understand how referring to someone’s socks, or a device, or some inanimate object can allow one to call those things “stupid”, but the fact of the matter is that referring to ones ideas as stupid is redundant to calling the person stupid directly because they both refer to the intelligence and original thoughts of a person and therefore literally mean the same thing by definition.

Furthermore, the notion that saying for example “Your shirt is stupid” or “Your idea is stupid” or “your feelings are stupid” instead of “You are stupid” is not ad hominem due to the colloquial usage is laughable as a fallacious argument only needs to attack the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person rather than attacking the substance of the argument to be considered ad hominem, and if a persons ideas are not considered an attribute of them, I don’t know what is.

I think I’m pretty brushed up on how this works, but perhaps you should take your own advice, thanks.

“I only took a bite out of the bread, therefore I didnt eat any bread.”

Astounding, apparently you can counter the findings of this paper which proves beyond reasonable doubt that google is progressively getting worse when it comes to returning reliable and accurate search engine results.

https://downloads.webis.de/publications/papers/bevendorff_2024a.pdf?ref=404media.co

I’m sure the scientific community would be really glad to see the evidence you have to the contrary, I’ll even peer review your paper for you, let me know when you have a draft ready.

If it provably disabled all functionality and features of the AI, then I would find that acceptable.

I’ll usually debate people as well, but not those who resort to a logic fallacy as boring as ad hominem for lack of an argument. Seeya.

No, actually if you read my comment my idea is that they can use an AI release of the browser, while people who don’t want AI in their browser can use a different release without it.

In response to “So your idea is that visually impaired people should just cry about not having alt text on a lot of images?”.

This is a loaded question. You shaped the question to be this way so that it would contain presumption of my being guilty of not caring for the differently abled when I have never done such a thing.

My comment just suggests that options are good for consumers, in this case the option of being able to choose if you want AI in your software.

If you have a real argument against that idea that is not predicated on presumptive guilt regarding a topic different to what I was talking about like in your first response, feel free to let me know what it is.

To clarify for you, my saying “Users should have a choice of whether AI is in their browser” being met with your “Then you must hate blind people and want them to cry” does not follow and does not constitute an argument to the contrary.

Any browser which only offers an AI inclusive release, I won’t use.

If any company that produces browsers really, truly, cared about their customer base, they would offer an AI release and a non-AI release.

Edit: It’s unfortunate to see that we have reached a stage as consumers that even daring to suggest an option be provided results in such responses. Good luck to all of you when you decide you want an option when a business does something you don’t like with a product because clearly you’ll have no one interested in listening to you.

You might also be interested in cron/crontab. You can schedule scripts/software to run at specific times of day, week, month, year etc.

Also if you want to learn more about the linux command line, three super useful commands for you are ‘man’, ‘help’ and ‘apropos’.

man followed by a command, like ‘man find’ will show you the manual pages for the command ‘find’, showing you how to use it.

In some cases man wont work for some commands, in those cases try ‘help theCommandThatDidntWorkWithMan’.

apropos followed by a query like ‘apropos network’ will show you any commands that have ‘network’ in their short description to help you find commands that you might want to use for something.

Google is helpful when you have questions

Haha, what’s it like living in 2012 still?

(Just hopefully not Nord VPN)