This is a dictionary definition. Non-combatant ISIS members are also civilians. Whether they deserve to die or not has no legal bearing. Im unsure why that is considered controversial.
This is not the legal definition of civilian.
He is by definition a civilian that was murdered. Legal definitions do not care about our political opinions. It appears to be very likely he was a civilian who deserved to be murdered but that does not change the definition
? Who said he was innocent
Clearly everyone here is illiterate lol
Literally the opposite of what I said. How do you go from ‘hard to feel sad about it’ to ‘ it’s truly terrible’?
Yes? They deserve to be held accountable but even in a fair legal system they would not face the death penalty while those actually directly participating in or ordering war crimes would.
Nah. It’s very easy to argue that murder is ethically wrong or unjustified but it certainly is effective.
I mean he’s still a civilian and it it’s still murder but yeah hard to feel sad about it
You think they’ll stand up for Palestinians when they won’t for their own diplomats?
Can confirm at least one
You can although that is uncommon.
The SA president seems amused if anything
If they intentionally murder a foreign diplomat that country would very likely to militarily intervene, Israel or not.
This would be entirely unsurprising to the majority of people outside the US
The diplomats are antisemetic for being shot at
Can someone eli5 why a plane successfully evading a missile is cause for panic?
If they do it wouldn’t be Finland anyway
Hey Goosebumps are great