Congrats!

Oh yeah, I love playing with Linux phones. I once created a container, installed Proton bridge in it and enjoyed having my mails in the native phone app.

It’s gonna be different case by case, but my best guess would be it starts as wanting to please the community, then realising Linux users get weird errors they never hear about from Windows users and then deciding that all 5 Linux users are not worth it if the issue doesn’t concern majority (Windows) users.

As for missing features, usually it happens because they use some Windows-native feature (like direct DirectX calls) which saves them implementing workarounds for their engine. And porting to some Linux api is delayed indefinitely for the same reasons as bug fixes: not large enough user base.

Linux gamers often say stuff like “it’s literally one toggle in [insert game engine here]” but that’s never the case. Doesn’t mean new devs don’t fall for it.

IMO we should fuck native Linux builds - game engines are complex and messy beasts, building on one platform and testing on Proton is the best for everyone, IMO.

Because it costs money to maintain that most indie studios don’t have given the small target audience. I simply always use Proton, even if a native version exists.

Thanks. I’m a Bambu user now. Might have to come back to Prusa some day because I really dislike what Bambu’s doing lately, but so far not a single thing has broken (well, other than things I broke) after two years of use.

I would really like something top level which is not made by Prusa nor Bambu, I guess.

Hey, OpenSCAD is the best! Also Shapelab seems like it might be interesting (sculpt in VR), though I haven’t yet tried it.

They didn’t, apart from when the motor got broken which they send me a replacement for.

Lucky you, I even got a faulty motor in there. Getting a good print was constant tinkering. That’s fine for Ender 3 price point, not Prusa prices.

Maybe I was just unlucky, but unlike many people on the internet I simply don’t like Prusa printers.

My first printer was Prusa MINI and it sucked so much. Something constantly stuck or broken.

And when they went closed source, they lost all my support.

That really depends on the implementation. In the case of gluetun, yes, no data can leak.

In Linux, by interface binding, no data can leak as well. No idea how Windows network stack is implemented.

Wish I could believe that, to me it seems like they’re just putting it all in place so later they have an easier time when they transition from voluntary to mandatory.

Why the hell even propose a voluntary law? It’s good that they decided to not pursue this, but why not just remove it entirely? This is such a bullshit.

Well, in some countries carriers don’t have a say in that.

Back to my trusty Xperia with SailfishOS, I guess.

Oh, fuck off Nothing, you were to be my next phone! Now I need to find a different European brand which does high-end smartphones. Which means only HMD remains unless something changed in the last few months.

1. Install Caddy on the host
2. Configure each service to forward to unique ports (say, 5001 for one service, 5002 for a different service)
3. Inside Caddyfile add a block like this for each service:

service1.example.com {
  reverse_proxy localhost:5001
}

It can be done in Apache as well, but Caddy is simply better and simpler.

As for images, take a look at Immich if that’s something you might want.

Monthly unless I learn about a vulnerability that would require it sooner.

What’s gluetun? Seems like it’s a VPN client? What’s special about it?

Gluetun can connect to multitude of VPNs, but most importantly it can be used to force other containers to use only the gluetun network, meaning if you disconnect from VPN for whatever reason, the other containers don’t suddenly send data over non-VPN network.

So if you’re torrenting and use gluetun to provide internet to the qBittorrent container, you won’t accidentally reveal your real IP if your provider’s server goes down for a few seconds.

How do you use it in your setup?

Configure it to connect to my VPN, create a file with the public port it uses, configure qBittorrent to only use gluetun for network and some script which reads the file with public port and changes it in qBittorrent.

Do I need to know about this if I use Tailscale on the host for connecting to my VPN?

Depends. I like having everything container related in the containers. Sometimes I need to do something without VPN, this would limit me. Also, if you don’t configure disconnect on VPN connection loss in a different way (interface binding), you risk revealing your IP.

Would gluetun allow me to use an additional VPN provider for certain apps without messing with the host Tailscale?

Yes. Though you would be double VPNed: App -> gluetun -> host VPN -> target server. That would probably add some latency.

Linux Mint, lemmings.world, mastodon.social. I might be slightly biased with the Lemmy instance.

What’s the framework situation? I was planning on buying one next year.