Sounds like you’re saying “anyone who isn’t with me is against me.”

That would’ve happened anyways.

You say that as if voting for the lesser of two evils is by definition worth it.

Well they’re certainly not now.

A vote spent dishonestly is what I’d call a pissed away vote.

Is it not better, by definition, than spending time dishonestly?

By that logic, everything is a waste of time if more people are spending it some other way.

The whole point of a democracy is people speak their minds, is it not?

If you vote third party, your vote is an extension of your true self. If you vote for a potential winner just out of the likeliness they’ll win, is that really “you”?

Same logic if you don’t vote. In Australia, voting is a requirement for all citizens, and it’s disastrous because you end up with people who just don’t care filling up some random candidate’s score, so the outcome doesn’t reflect what people actually want.

That’s what I always choose.

It’s day four of Trump being in office and I’ve already been ghosted by dozens of people for the crime of not voting. Because, you know, immigrants who can’t vote are expected to vote too.

The modlog, at least when I look at it, only has me banned once.

Anywho, what about the other things.

…which is/are?

For what?

You say all that as if the modlogs themselves don’t clarify, with “oops” being written as the registered reason for the temp-ban, that someone in charge had made a mistake (which you’re claiming credit for as an intended move on your behalf), or that the very thing we’re discussing didn’t have to be blown out of the water by the very person we speak of, especially as a certain point I made (going back to the same replies of mine about the supposed tearfulness) has been proven, as it’s been proven to be a trend everyone else in his camp (who, as experienced politicians, namely ones in the Democratic league, you’d think would just recognize this a part of the process) has been using, which everyone else just wants to be relieved of and look back on with spirits as I’ve been optimistic enough to do for these three days and are growingly fed up with as a far more maladaptive variation threatens to make it hard for people with more genuine issues to be taken seriously. For such reasons, with the horse’s mouth as a source, without breaking the rule of unnecessary downvoting as others are able to get away regarding you as they have to me as a demonstration of its enforcement, would one think it’s out of place that I call double standard regarding the four things I describe just now?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

Removed by mod