

You are right, thanks! I misread the graph and thought it was a 4 cycles per day, which was puzzling me, but is indeed just a daily oscillation
The entity formerly known as Quantum Device trying to swim the fediverse…
You are right, thanks! I misread the graph and thought it was a 4 cycles per day, which was puzzling me, but is indeed just a daily oscillation
Intrigued by the quarter a day oscillation in that graph… 🤔
Next thing: “out law hurricanes” …good luck with all that
What kind of twisted toxic argument is to phrase it like that and call it news?
What kind of threat is that…
That sounds so naive…
Not to mention that plan and engagement of the NYT story is purely based on writers and potential readers relating to such fact, behave as if it is something worth of mentioning in a story in the first place borders hypocrisy… they forgot their first time got access to unlimited internet
This call for more hakas… 💪
Sounds like some insecurities need reaffirmation…
Dogfight as in two dogs barking each other with a fence in the middle… 😅
I picture one day of his childhood in which he was mocked by everyone at school when he misnamed things in geography class and now we live in this timeline when he claims revenge…
Hate and Love, sure…
For him that’s OK, he serves for the big corpos manufacturing in China, just realised how much was screwing them and fixed it… the rest can be boguht with a MAGA cap… made in China too
Being skeptic is not bad. Not seek nor relay on scientific evidences is the problem…
That’s why the orange toupee said that they were wining millions a day… buy the dip, sell the rip
Oh, man, I fear not, I really wish he screw us so hard that we become independent from USA through struggle… I just cross fingers that our representatives embrace the opportunity for real
Texting a video, oh my, that must have been exhausting per se but with the touchscreen smartphone keyboard it seems even more epic, to write so many 0s and 1s… kudos also for the receiver that translated the binary into a reproducible format…
Well, there is probably some survival/confirmation bias on that statistics, those answers are the funny ones… in any case probably is not necessary a LLM to state such statements
Why would they be right beyond word sequence frecuencies?