Based on the NYT article analyzing the video and satellite imagery, we can be fairly confident that it was a direct tomahawk hit. And checking the datellite images, the school looks like a part of the IRGC base, where other buildings were also targeted. So they most likely intended to hit the building, but they (obviously) didn’t know there was a school in it. A major fuckup caused by carelessness/incompetence that should have never happened, and heads should roll.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/08/world/middleeast/iran-minab-school-strike.html

Wow this is is bad. This game’s community has been always a shithole - in reddit, discord, and also in the game itself.

I remember when a guy was mad that my mortar blasted him. He waited until we completed the map and the shuttle touched down, then messaged me and kicked me before the mission was completed.

I only play with my friends now, and avoid public servers. It’s a fun, but often messy and buggy game.

Thanks for the sane comment. Anybody can check my posts and see that I hate the orange clown. That doesn’t change the facts about this submarine attack.

Doesn’t matter. Even if it was started illegally, in an armed conflict the rules of warfare apply

Nope. Even if the war was started illegally, as soon as there is an armed conflict, the same rules of warfare apply.

Every statement of this tweet is factually false.

The US did and does horrible things, but the attack of this ship was legal: https://www.uwa.edu.au/news/article/2026/march/us-sank-an-iranian-warship-and-didnt-rescue-survivors-is-this-legal-in-war

It was a cruel and cynical attack, but it adhered to the rules of warfare.

This doesn’t change that Trump is a monster and this war is horrible, but this torpedo attack itself was legal.

Edit: anybody thinking I’m defending Trump or his war on Iran can check my post history. This is my post from literally 1 day ago:

Exactly. It was a cynical and cruel action but it was legal, I just looked after the rules. It’s a fucking warship, doesn’t matter if the Iranians claim it was unarmed (or if it actually was).

Also, submarines are not required to provide rescuse, as surfacing would cause a risk to them. They are obliged to notify others that rescue is needed.

The US is doing many horrible and clearly illegal things. We can also argue about the ethics of this torpedo attack, but it was not illegal and not a war crime.

Here is a professor from Australia explaining: https://www.uwa.edu.au/news/article/2026/march/us-sank-an-iranian-warship-and-didnt-rescue-survivors-is-this-legal-in-war

Reddit For You

“The r/all experiment has concluded and the decision was made to remove r/all. I’m so sorry. =/ Reddit is leaning toward simplifying your experience to make it more personalized and relevant to your subscriptions and interests. I know some of you have some pretty strong feelings about this and I totally get that! Feel free to leave comments on this post. I will continue to pass along constructive feedback to that team.”

Any NZ or Aussie local to share some perspective? I’m fully OOTL

According to the latest research, RA is caused my inflammation triggered by the vagus nerve, and can be treated by electrical signals to the nerve https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-025-04114-7

This inflammation is I assume also damaging to other parts of the body, this the gum problems. Fascinating shit.

Bezos was a Senior VP by the age of 30, working for D.E. Shaw, and was a rumored heir for taking over the business after he retires. Bezos would have made billions and managed a major hedge fund. Set for life.

But that was not enough for him, he wanted to hoard hundreds of billions of wealth instead, so here we are. How perfectly healthy and in no way a mental illness.

Exactly. Ethically sourced brainrot is still brainrot

So the plan worked

Also, software development is already the best possible use case for LLMs: you need to build something abiding by a set of rules (as in a literal language, lmao), and you can immediately test if it works.

In e.g. a legal use case instead, you can jerk off to the confident sounding text you generated, then you get chewed out by the judge for having hallucinated references. Even if you have a set of rules (laws) as a guardrails, you cannot immediately test what the AI generated - and if an expert needs to read and check everything in detail, then why not just do it themselves in the same amount of time.

We can go on to business, where the rules the AI can work inside are much looser, or healthcare, where the cost of failure is extremely high. And we are not even talking about responsibilities, official accountability for decisions.

I just don’t think what is claimed for AI is there. Maybe it will be, but I don’t see it as an organic continuation of the path we’re in. We might have another dot com boom when investors realize this - LLMs will be here to stay (same as the internet did), but they will not become AGI.

“You will own nothing and you will be happy”