The cylinder cannot be damaged in any way
The cylinder cannot be damaged in any way
Is it an excuse, or an explanation?
I worked with an AS400 while in vehicle logistics, those things are optimized for simple functions but high data throughput
If that dude got proper support, he could have done wonders; he made animated icons for his 16-color assembly-coded OS, and a simple 3d racer! All by himself!
She was lied to. She can join us. Big Tent Energy.
They sent people to the jungle without shelter. Do you really think they plan to meet all of their needs? And if they are just doing their best to cope with the migrants, then the US is responsible for sending them to a place that could not handle them.
It’s not a separate issue at all, these people would not be in Panama at all if the US had followed its own laws, and these camps would not exist.
The US is calling the shots, you admitted they might not be following the law, and yet you expect the US to follow the rules they create and break? That’s a very niave outlook on global politics.
They are both places in which the government keeps people, exposed to the elements, only barely meeting their material needs, with the idea that such an arrangement is temporary.
Tell me, what differences between these camps and the Panama ones matter in a practical sense? The side of the border the detanees were born on?
I’m guessing OP means the build quality, as defined by the mechanical and material standards that are needed to recreate the keyboard.
Her accomplishments are erased from public record, making it hard to prove she worked where she worked and affected her career.
Oh haha cause it wouldn’t be recorded
Why would we have the word “assassination” if it’s just murder? The word was invented to fill a linguistic need.
While the practical event is the exact same, its implications to the currently living are distinct. Saying this is an assassination communicates that this murder is unique, and should be thought of in a different context than most murders.
You made a lot of assumptions about the person you’re responding to. Whose “they”? Who are the liars? When did the poster say anything about pieces of shit?
@surewhynotlem@lemmy.world to answer the question, one must assume that the celebrity is taking action based on choice, until they say otherwise. It is a person’s responsibility to inform people if their actions are compromised. Otherwise, one should point out traits that are toxic, disconnected from a suspicion of mental illness.
I have fond memories of the MS-DOS game
Adorable expressions, cats really are clever
They’re communicating that the original post is not a meme, it is news.
And watching an account for a year isn’t simping?
What are you doing watching someone for a year? What could you possibly gain from that effort? OP clearly lives in your head rent free
Gorgeous planet
And he had bespoke animations that were kinda charming