OK so what we have here is a winter dog bed summer hammock situation.
And then bankrupt it!
What do you mean actual jammer? If it puts out RF at a power level greater than the surrounding environment it is a jammer, correct? I would think for this attack to work you could just target the camera freqs used, you don’t have to target the whole home’s WiFi network. Probably a narrower range to focus on.
There’s been a concerted effort to infiltrate and influence politics by conservative Christians for years. I think events like the Brook Brothers riot emboldened dropping the thin veil of the Democratic process as they saw you can literally steal an election and no one will do anything about it. The real test of what the people will tolerate is only beginning, I fear.
Businesses of a different industry can use the same name. There is nothing keeping you from using the website for blogging. The computer store might be problematic if it could be construed you are trying to profit from EA’s established trademark. Also, why would you want a .org for a storefront? I’d say get a different domain for your computer store.
Give the crested geckos their independence! (My only knowledge of New Caledonia is gecko-based).
Which is better, “urine us” or “your anus”?
You need calcium.
The luck bit really clashes with the survivorship bias.
You’re right that default credentials should have gone away a decade ago. From my experience with security cameras, default credentials were the norm ~5 years ago and now most prompt you to create a unique password. That industry typically lags slightly in infosec best practices. I would expect routers to require a higher level of security.
Please tell me everyone has figured out that all large companies are pure fucking evil
Fixed that for you
I agree that microtransactions and loot boxes in gaming need regulation as well. Hopefully this is a step towards that.
Any protections to consumers are a win. I think overall this will be a positive for gamers.
IMHO this ruling is shortsighted and pushes for a future with increased monitisation that isn’t in the box value of the game and targets to hurt the Devs that make consumer friendly games while giving games with loot boxes and microtransactions an advantage in the market when talking in terms of overall sales for the devs.
Your last paragraph could hold some truth if publishers think this will affect profits. I don’t know if this would significantly impact profits since we’re talking about a new secondary market that did not exist in the digital space before. There’s probably some historical data for how physical used game sales affect new game sales but it might be hard to quantify since that market has existed pretty much from the beginning.
I would anticipate another across the board price increase for games as a result, but I see this more as an excuse for greed on the publishers’ parts rather than a cost to offset any actual lost revenue.
Even the name Penguin is a hybrid of polar and penguin.
Most companies deploy management software on their mobile devices. They have the ability to monitor activity and do things like remote wipe the device if you’re fired. On iPhone go to settings->general->vpn and device management to see if anything’s there.
Split personality Batman who hates the rich would be amazing.