

deleted by creator


deleted by creator


Imagine seeing records like this breaking every summer and still denying climate breakdown.


“I’m sorry the lower value human capital heard me call them that.”


When my butler read this to me, I couldn’t contain my outrage.


Almost makes you wonder why the CIA keeps getting into bed with them, if that’s the case.


If you did it, it wouldn’t be called “used illegally” it would be given its more traditional name of “stealing.”
Subcultures. These days, it’s just an aesthetic choice.


It’s not an illegal bribe, if we legalise it and call it lobbying. *taps head


I mean, we’ve barely started. I don’t think it’s time to think about when we should stop. But, if we have to, it’ll be when it’s finished.


They do have these programs but they barely scratch the surface or even contra the damage currently being done to the communities in question.
It’s not exactly easy but it’s not exactly impossible either. Of course, not you necessarily, someone could keep declaring it impossible to do no matter much the subject is researched.
For example, we can see that the communities effected by this have had far less investment than places that benefitted. The way to fix a severe lack of investment is through significant investment. There’ll be more, of course, but that’s an easy one right there.


Arming and radicalising traumatised people and setting them against people you don’t like is quite the American staple.


That’s how you deal with terrorists.


deleted by creator


Because American and other intelligence agencies was and still is using the kompromat to blackmail people.


When the genocide happened. I thought that was obvious.


They had private enterprise. So, In what way were they not capitalist? Imperial colonial economies are capitalist, by nature.


Tbf, i dont think they could name all of the African American slaves or the millions killed in the DRC.
You know the drill: Ukrainian starvation genocide = crime of communism.
When the Turkish capitalist empire does the same to Armenians, that’s just one of those things. Feels kinds commie though.


I see what you mean, in terms of democracy being a problem capitalism is trying to solve and, also, that the rich and powerful will never allow us to simply vote away their ill-gotten wealth and power.
I don’t think that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try though or just lament that we were born too late though.
If enough people wanted to, we could change things very quickly. I don’t see why that would mean we would have to have those all of those things, let alone for an extended period. Really, you’re rationalising a status quo bias.


Just like work. If a government tried to treat us like that, we would have a revolution tomorrow. Yet, we’ve all been groomed into just accepting it.
If the CEOs didn’t do it, the shareholders would ruin their lives.