Because you make it that. Its political for you but for me, no.

Ok Stalin

Graphene already supports Winevine L1 without Play Integrity. It has nothing to do with DRM, its a seperate system.

I’ve always got help, and the moderators are really nice.

You practically cant brick it with the very simple Web Installer.

That is not a webview. You have to understand what you’re talking about.

No. Even if a Firefox webview existed, it woul’d not use the extensions from your main browser. An adblock option is available from the native alpha settings if you’re interested.

This is unrelated. You want to familiarize yourself with the concept of OS integrity and how it is different from data encryption. You can have a passphrase that encrypts your data alongside having access to these hardware features.

It has very minimal code and its implemented in a robust manner. Unlike UEFI and the desktop implementation of secure boot, it does work well and it has not yet been exploited on pixels. Its way better to have any kind of OS integrity check than none.

What a smart thing to say 🥱

The fact that youre illiterate and you’re hallucinating stuff i never said, is sad. I will address your concern however.

If you think that they are actually not encrypting the message content, then you’re a conspiracy theorist. They have thousands of other ways to track the user and give metadata to law enforcement. There is no need for them to lie about protecting the messages, as none of the regular users care about that. They had more than enough users of Messenger even before it was E2EE.

I’d still rather use meta tho (which end to end encrypts the content) than unencrypted plaintext shit that goes straight to the government.

Removed by mod

Switzerland be W Rizz Skibidi af ngl 🤪

Removed by mod

If you’re an adult, and you’re interested in children’s romance thats the same issue. In fact, all content directed towards older audences featuring this kind of stuff, is directed to, and made by pedos.

The downwoters should be investigated.

This is still not a reason to automatically grant them. This permission model is fundamentally flawed. Besides, the CLI doesn’t even show these.

Also. Maintaining snap packages are easier for developers, and companies, therefore they are more likely to distribute apps on Linux to begin with.

Its only worse than not having it at all in the sense of giving users a false sense of security. Imagine if apps on mobile could decide what permissions they want automatically granted without the user opting in. The sandbox HAS to be enforced by default to be good. And the other issue with flatpak is the security, which we had several problems with in the past. On the same note, people criticise snap but its a much more competent solution from a technical standpoint regarding security and since people get all their apps from flathub anyways, the “propreitary” backend is mostly irrelevant. And before anyone says “snap store had malware hosted” that is not an issue with the format itself but the infrastructure.