

I’m wondering if things like FAS (which can have certain facial characteristics) are muddling the results as well.


I’m wondering if things like FAS (which can have certain facial characteristics) are muddling the results as well.
Thought that was severe frostbite at first! Glad I read through.
“That may be so sir, but we’re still gonna need a name to put on your daughter’s birth certificate”
Shrove Tuesday?


Took the plunge this week. My secondary hard drive now has Mint and I’ve got it working so when I boot up I select which os/drive to start up. The plan is to use Mint primarily for awhile and get used to it.
Definitely a bit less intuitive, and many things are still needing to be done through the consol instead of the GUI which is annoying. Haven’t had success migrating my Firefox profile without creating an account. Haven’t figured out how to get the “dual” monitor setup to work the way a I want either. Feels like a bit of a downgrade but I’m hoping once I get past the initial setup pains it’ll be smooth sailing.


Yeah, seems like a stretch. Plus, every photo of Trump is a Nazi reference anyways, since that’s what he references.
Close both doors, but not enough to latch, then watch which cat caves first and opens the door


How’d they get there? Human activity or somehow carried by weather maybe?


Doesn’t have to the superior, but one of personal preference. You like the current cultural values and know other cultures don’t necessarily share them and so fear a cultural shift.
In this case though I think you’re right that there’s a strong superiority aspect.
That’s an Uruk-Hai, you can’t fool me
One sentence and she got in his pants. Sounds like a success to me


I’m shocked… That he got the expression correct.
One out of every four species. Very different
Unpopular opinion: there’s a point where more stacked=less attractive and it’s super common in anime to have crossed that line.

This us the first time I come across this; are the ratios different or something? Why do people prefer the taste of the sugar cane version (unless it’s physiological)?
Thought that was a raw chicken for a second


Did he actually do anything with India/Pakistan?
I doubt they are saying to discard all motives; specifically they said “murder is murder” so using cases that aren’t intentional (ie manslaughter, not murder) undermines your point. It’s more that there’s an upper limit or certain criteria where we stop caring what the person’s motives are, so where do we draw that line? I don’t pretend to know the answer, but it’s a question worth exploring even if you think you know the answer already.