Wow I’m shocked you have no downvotes. I totally agree but Lemmy seems to hate internet restrictions, especially porn. Don’t come for their porn. They’ll destroy you.

You need help if you actually think it would be difficult to come up with any number of better ways to protest

Leftist dog whistles to distract from the fact that you’re just as bad as the other side forcing low paid laborers to clean up shit so you can play revolutionary and not even do a good job at that.

So effective

That’s such a privileged point of view. The people who are affected by this did not consent to being part of their shitty protest. They very likely could not afford (in more ways than one) to go on strike.

So what you’re saying is it does nothing because she has people clean it up for her anyways. Nice.

Using poor people as your pawns to make some edgy point using anima feces is worthy of a class war in itself. You’re not helping the poor. You’re helping the middle class.

You literally can’t think of better ways to protest that wouldn’t involve people probably making less money than you picking up feces? That is sad and why this group and those you support will make no progress.

That’s a crazy opinion. So just use them as your shit cleaning pawns? Such a privileged mindset.

Doesn’t have to be cow shit tho. There’s no foresight or empathy. You’re just making these poor laborers clean up after your protest that does nothing except make you feel good about yourself thinking you’re modern day Rosa Parks.

So have them clean manure until things change? Nice.

So then the poor laborers working there have to clean up manure? Not the brightest idea.

Thanks!

This is great. Let’s also have a charge for rape by men.

Got it. It’s more than just murder. There should be a word for rape by men as well.

Well, I’m not those people.

The article does little to explain the law and its motivation.

Hate crime charges are completely different because they enhance existing charges. Would this then eliminate the degrees of murder? If murder of a woman then instantly life vs murdering somebody else and then deciding if first, second, etc.? I supposed you’d have to prove it’s femicide just like a hate crime?

I support this, I’m just curious. Thanks for the discussion.

Not sure why people assume I’m against it for asking questions. I’m just curious. People are too aggressive.

So this is an attempt to make murder against women easier to prosecute? Meaning that murderers of women had not been getting life before?

Ah I see. So somebody would be convicted of femicide instead of murder. What’s the intended affect of that?

You know nobody cares about a 24 and a 26 year old dating

And regular murder isn’t life in prison?