You’re the one profile stalking. You replied to me on both threads. Go fuck yourself.

Blow a few more vessels and see if it digs you out of that hole you’re in

Sounds like projection on your part, pal

Snitching on yourself so hard you had to delete it within 30 minutes, I see. Good job. Slow clap.

Oh no, I would never do that. I’m not a medical professional. In case you missed it, I said they should go to the ER and have samples collected.

You know, that way they can actually match the DNA and prove in court that someone is guilty of raping them.

For all your concern trolling about statistics of rape not getting prosecuted, you don’t seem to care very much about actually getting rapists prosecuted. Strange.

That’s what tells me you only care about holding onto the power you derive from “believe women.” If no one is going to question any allegations you make, then suddenly men have to tip-toe around you lest they attract your ire. I bet that makes you powerful.

If I say I got stabbed, you’d ask to see my wound. If all I did was get upset that you don’t believe me, it wouldn’t convince you. And then I’d go “bro, point to where I said you should always believe someone who claims they’ve been stabbed even when they refuse to show proof.” It wouldn’t be very convincing.

They rely on self-reporting by nature of “x% goes unreported.” Where else is that data coming from? If you think there isn’t a single false case that gets included in that, then I have a bridge to sell you.

And it’s vague because it has no bearing on the case in question.

I asked how that statistic was collected, because it sounds like it was mostly self-reporting, and if you think there are no flaws with that then you don’t understand statistics.

It’s like saying “X% of drug addiction goes unreported.” Who’s measuring this? How did they collect their data? It’s a huge red flag to anyone familiar with statistical methods.

How many lives will be destroyed when republicans hold onto their senate majority after Susan Collins wins?

The evidence is nowhere near conclusive, and if it was you would have linked to that instead of appealing to vague statistics

Do you not know what paraphrasing is?

You can’t say “Victims don’t need proof. You should always believe them.” And then backpedal by claiming “I never said the exact words that you should always believe victims no matter what in every case.'”

It’s kind of childish that you think you gave plausible deniability simply because my paraphrasing wasn’t quoting you verbatim.

Your sources had nothing to do with the particular case in question. Show up to a bench trial bringing only statistics and see how long it takes the judge to dismiss your case.

If you cared about victims you would encourage them to go to the ER and get a forensics panel done alongside testing for transmissible diseases. If you were so concerned with getting justice for the victims that’s what you would do.

Clearly that’s not your goal here, and all you want to do is normalize being able to destroy men’s lives over mere allegations.

Rape is an evil and despicable thing to do. Accusing an innocent person of rape is also despicable. And there’s no cognitive dissonance in saying both of those things.

It’s not deflection so much as I don’t entertain sealioning. You can feign ignorance all you want but I won’t dance to your tune.

What do you think this post is about? What do you think the main point it’s trying to make is?

She’s not a victim.

What interest am I serving other than removing republicans’ senate majority?

What interests are you serving?

Gaslight me harder. You’ve already stretched credulity far enough. I don’t expect your mind to ever change. I hope to never have the displeasure of meeting you in person.

It’s a bit hyperbolistic in order to show the gaping hole in your logic. It’s called a reductio ad absurdum, look it up.

You’re the only one here acting like your own thoughts are the ultimate truth. “Believe every woman always because they never lie, ever!”

A bunch of statistics of alleged cases? When the prevailing mentality is “always believe every case”? I’m sure that’s so credible.

And even if there was some way of verifying such a statistic, that still wouldn’t demonstrate guilt in any individual case. If you want to convict an actual rapist, you need to gather evidence. That means collecting samples. If you don’t like that, tough, I don’t get to decide how reality operates, and neither do you. But I’m not going to believe every accusation I hear just because you want to virtue signal about how women supposedly don’t need to have any evidence in order to accuse someone.

Stop trying to blame every man in the world just because two thirds of alleged rape victims inexplicably decide not to even try to press charges. That’s their choice, but they kinda forfeit any expectation to be taken seriously when they decide to bring it up five years later with no evidence.

But sure, continue trying to pretend that it’s somehow misogynist to say “rape victims should gather evidence if they want to secure a conviction.” You’re only hurting actual victims.

Apparently you can’t

There are a multitude of proxies for political affiliation that can be used instead to stealthily gerrymander. And you have no way of ensuring that an unconstitutionally mandated computer program wouldn’t include those.

None of that demonstrates guilt in any individual case. You can cite statistics all you want, but that doesn’t give you license to go out in public, spin around three times, point to a man and yell “he raped me!”