• realitista@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    5 hours ago

    As far as I can tell, the advantages of Mastodon over Bluesky are:

    • Well implemented federation
    • moopet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago
      • No “starter kits” which are just positive-feedback loops for popular accounts
      • No “algorithm” which promotes popularity or engagement over quality or relevance
      • realitista@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        36 minutes ago

        Bluesky’s main feed is totally algorithm free, it’s just the people you follow’s posts in chronological order, same as mastodon.

        Starter kits are optional, but they allow you to get started in hours rather than months. For me, they made the difference between a vibrant and interesting feed well tailored towards my interests, and a very sparse feed that I didn’t use on Mastodon. For me they were the difference between a useful social network and a non-useful one.

    • Dicska@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Haha, thanks! I know it’s quite important for a good bunch of people here (on a federated site), but I guess I’ll stick with Bluesky then. Thanks for the insights! : )

      • naught101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        It’s important because, along with the ability to migrate accounts, it prevents/deters enshittification. In betting Bluesky will hit that wall in the next few years (I’m guessing they’ll never properly implement federation).