• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    It’s been done hundreds of times from different groups all over the fucking world. There is no correlation. This is a waste of time and money when these people have more important fucking things to be handling.

    • ArtemisimetrA@lemmy.duck.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      But that money is being wasted to make sure they find the correlation this time for suresies, guys, we’re definitely going to prove the whole rest of the world wrong this time wif our big smawt amewican bwainses

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        And all the other health organizations will still have the same data and disprove it immediately. You can just outright say whatever the fuck you want publicly and it’s the same effect. This won’t stop vaccines. It won’t stop people from getting vaccines. It won’t stop doctors from recommending vaccines. It’ll only make people look fucking stupid and useless.

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        I’m aware, but they cant fudge the numbers or fake studies because THE DATA IS PUBLIC. Coming out with a bullshit finding is still easily disproven because everyone else can still see your data. Then you just look like a bigger fucking idiot.

        It’s like trying to fake a slip and fall in a casino when you have hundreds of cameras watching you from all angles.

          • just_another_person@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            You’re missing the part about public data. The CDC is legally required to post any data from studies conducted. This is because guidance of these studies is to be considered by medical institutions and professionals. It’s not a board of opinion that just randomly issues guidance with no scientific data to back it up.

            Using your example of the sharpie incident: he was mercilessly made fun of and laughed at, and numerous organizations came out and told him what a fucking idiot he was, and nobody listened to a thing he had to say regarding the context of the storm.

            Take that into account with this study:

            1. They come out with a bullshit study and slap the CDC’s letterhead on it
            2. Medical organizations look at the data
            3. Everyone notices the fake information and false numbers because…people aren’t fucking idiots.
            4. Nobody listens

            All these doom and gloom points of view are just not in the realm of reason and are completely ignorant of the fact that the rest of the world still exists and reviews this data as well.

            Everyone knows these people are idiots and mentally ill. The CDC is a scientific institution, yes, but does everyone need to abide by everything they say? Fuck no.

            If they issue a falsified study, it will be immediately disproven. Publicly. They aren’t a law-making agency by any means, so can they force medical institutions to abide by their studies? Fuck no.

            They’ll be laughed at by the rest of the world, and the dumbest amongst us will die of preventable diseases while trying to sidestep autism and find out it still exists anyway, while the more intelligent of us get vaccines and live on.

            If that’s these assholes want to take that road, then I welcome it. Fuck em.

            • MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              5 months ago

              You’re missing the part about public data. The CDC is legally required to post any data from studies conducted.

              I mean, in general I agree, but the people directing this aren’t exactly the rule-following type. Nor do they care about facts, truth, or integrity. Anything published will fit the narrative. Anything that doesn’t fit the narrative will be blackholed.

              • just_another_person@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                To what effect though? That’s my point. You’re just yelling into the void of mental illness by publishing fake data. Nobody is going to listen when other, better, competing data is not falsified.

                The CDC doesn’t control anything. They just publish data. They can’t ban vaccines, nor can Congress, and there is no legislation that can prevent people from getting them, so whatever the darkest possible outcome is won’t do anything.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah, but this time they already have the results they want they just need someone to tell them they are right.

  • Xanza@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    WE’RE SAVING HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS BY CUTTING SOCIAL PROGRAMS TO THROW THE WORKING POOR TO THE WOLVES TO REDO STUDIES THAT HAVE BEEN DONE HUNDREDS OF TIMES BECAUSE THEY DON’T COME TO THE CONCLUSIONS WE WANT!