cm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comexternal-linkmessage-square74linkfedilinkarrow-up1484arrow-down111
arrow-up1473arrow-down1external-linkMicrosoft's quantum computing claims slammed as 'fraudulent'www.windowscentral.comcm0002@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square74linkfedilink
minus-squareLv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·2 years ago until it’s better we should simply ignore this That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
minus-squareImgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·2 years agoWith quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
minus-squaredaniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoMany people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
minus-squareTreczoks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoThe idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.
That seems like a strange comment to make. How will it get better if we don’t spend the time and effort to make it better?
With quantum computing if you ignore it you are simultaneously not ignoring it?
I don’t think so, but yes.
Many people in lemmy is highly primitivist and tech conservatives. Meaning that they don’t actually want any technological progress.
The idea is not to have three worthless announcements per week. They can get better all they want, and come back once they have tangible results.