I’m trying out Obsidian for taking notes, and this made me laugh.

    • marduk@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I like nano because it has worked any time I needed it. I don’t dislike nano because I’m not good enough at Linux to have ever run into its limitations

      • bioemerl@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Vim really is an IDE, not a text editor. It’s usable as an editor but overkill.

        Nano serves a difference purpose. It’s like telling someone on a bike that a mustang is better.

        • Kogasa@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Vim is absolutely not an IDE. It has no integrations with any language. It’s just a powerful text editor. You can add language plugins and configure it to be an IDE.

          • Bo7a@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            No offense intended here - But why is this being upvoted?

            vim absolutely is an IDE if that is how you want to use it. Syntax highlighting, linter, language specific autocomplete, integrated sed/regex. And much, much more.

            • Kogasa@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              8 months ago

              Syntax highlighting, linting, and language specific autocomplete are features supported by plugins and scripts. Plain, simple vim is a powerful extensible text editor. The extensibility makes it easy to turn into an IDE.

                • Kogasa@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Yeah, there is a generic syntax highlighting scheme. I had forgotten because it’s not very good for some languages, I’d replaced it with a LSP-based implementation years ago.

                • Kogasa@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I’m not a text editor. But anyway, would you call a shell script that invokes python.exe $1 a Python IDE? Why would you? Vim isn’t designed to facilitate the use of vimscript, vimscript is just an extensibility feature of Vim.

                  • bioemerl@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Vim isn’t designed to facilitate the use of vimscript, vimscript is just an extensibility feature of Vim.

                    Vim is designed to edit code, by the people who were doing it back in the 70s and all of its features are there to enable better, faster, and more efficient editing.

                    It has scripts for the sake of those scripts enabling integrated developer features. Because they’re part of vim they’re in the environment and the program is used predominantly for development.

          • Frank Müller@mastodon.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            @kogasa Hehe, shit, so long done something wrong as I use #vim as an IDE. Okay, some own helpers, some plugins, the direct integration for #golang via LSP and since some time also ChatGPT and Copilot. But hey, it’s no IDE. 🤪

    • XEAL@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Here!

      I hate terminal-based text editors

      Nano seems quite user/idiot friendly