• Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Uhhh no… the value of your house is what somebody might buy it for IF YOU SOLD IT. Until you actually do sell it, you don’t get that money or “make money in real estate”. As I said, taxing you at the point where you sell the house would make sense to me - because that’s when you’re actually getting money. The way property taxes are now, people are being taxed on money they might hypothetically get in the future.

    Now it’s true that you can borrow against your home value - this is known as a home equity loan or a line of credit. So you potentially have that available - but even that is not “making money in real estate”, it’s borrowing money that you have to pay back.

    Srsly, what grade are you in?

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Now it’s true that you can borrow against your home value - this is known as a home equity loan or a line of credit.

      That is literally how every billionaire funds their lifestyle, just borrowing against stocks instead of home equity. If people with $4 million homes are not rich, then neither are most billionaires.

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        It’s also NOT literally how a typical homeowner lives their life. Those are the people I’m talking about, who are being taxed on money they don’t have.