• librecat@lemmy.basedcount.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 months ago

    Accessibility and internationalization first. A lot of projects start without it and tack it on later. It’s so much better to have good roots and promote diversity and inclusivity from the start.

    • RonSijm@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Could you elaborate in what context and to what extend? I can agree that bigger companies with large user-bases should have a focus on accessibility and internationalization -

      But generally a lot of projects start with just one dev solving a problem they have themselves and make their solution Open-Source. Anecdotally, I’m dumping my solutions on Github that are already barely accessible to anyone somewhat tech-illiterate. No one is paying me anything for it. Why would I care whether it’s accessible or internationalized for non-English speakers?

      • librecat@lemmy.basedcount.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        As a solo developer, some things are out of scope like writing translations or ensuring full compliance with accessibility standards. What’s important is to have some knowledge of what things block progress in these areas. For example, not treating all strings like ASCII, or preferring native widgets/html elements as those better support accessiblity tools.

      • ursakhiin@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Internationalization isn’t about the translation. It’s about not hard coding the strings that display. Putting them somewhere that is easy to swap out would allow users to provide their own if they wanted.