• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Unrelated but how do people feel about the ai images when used for something like this.

    The font is very telling for being DallE

    • NightFantom@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I think it strongly detracts from the post. I basically skipped right to the comments without clicking the link because I’m assuming it’s AI slop, and I’m hoping the comments are interesting.

    • HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      People would be less mad if you straight up used a stock image with a watermark so I don’t understand why people go out of their way to use AI when they know people will comment on it and it will detract from the point of the article.

      Also, using AI in the thumbnail makes people automatically assume you’re using AI in the text as well. And if you’re not doing that, why would you lessen the perceived value of your writing by making it seem like you are?

      It just seems pointless and actively harms your actual goals because people will get hung up on the fact that you used AI and ignore your actual valid points. Especially when you’re writing about open source projects when most people interested in open source are vehemently anti-AI, it really just shows you don’t know your target audience.

      • subtext@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        While I mostly agree with you (and 100% on it distracting from the article), I think you’re not thinking about image rights.

        If you’re a serious blogger with a good sized blog, a lawsuit or DMCA or otherwise is potentially a killer outcome of using an image you don’t 100% sure have the rights to. With AI, you can be 100% sure you can use the image however you want, without any repercussions. I’d imagine that’s huge in the considerations for a blogger.

        • solardirus@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          42 minutes ago

          I dont think this is a reasomable counterpoint because the target audience in question would also vastly prefer shit as simple as an mspaint illustration or a dithered irl image.

          Also, it is quite feasible to find royalty free images, and I have no idea where you’re getting the impression it is not. There are a host of images that provide licensing metadata. Google image search and co. can find these. It’s simply a matter of verifying the license authenticity.

          It’s just fundementally stupid.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I strong hate these imagines with a piss tint. I can’t stand them. And the text has these tiny AI-flavoured imperfections too.

      • wvstolzing@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        12 hours ago

        The ‘recreated’ photorealistic thumbnails on youtube are even worse, IMHO – especially when they involve subtly warped faces of familiar people.

    • calamityjanitor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Personally I think it’s fallen out of fashion. For my blog I’d either use a meme or other dump picture for each post. When generated images first came out I used a few for blog posts, it was new and interesting and said “I’m interested in technology and like playing around with new things”.

      Nowadays I’m back on the meme pics. I feel now it’s so much easier to generate images, it more says “I want to look professional but also spend no money and have no standards”.