• MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    TBF, they can be fooled too.

    Bitwarden warns against using autofill on load for that very reason, as then simply loading a malicious page might cause it to provide passwords to such a site.

    And then, a human when a site doesn’t autofill, is more likely to just go “huh, weird” and do it manually.

    • lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      they can be fooled too.

      Makes it harder: when I go to the wrong website, the manager simply doesn’t suggest credentials (it does not have) for it. That causes me to wonder why.

      Without a password manager, a user is never prompted to wonder. They’d simply not notice.

      • gaylord_fartmaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 minutes ago

        Someone manages to maliciously sneak username and password fields onto a site that store what is entered as soon as it’s typed. They don’t even have to be visible to the user and bitwarden will fill them in as soon as the page loads.

    • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      You’ve always got the human element, bypassing security features; but extra little hurdles like a password manager refusing to autofill an unknown url is at least one more opportunity for the user to recognize that something’s wrong and back away.

      If you’re already used to manually typing in the auth details, you may not even notice you’re not on the site you were expecting.