• Einar@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    3.1 looked terrible.

    2000 was stable and looked decent for it’s time. Enjoyed the look of 10, but behind the scenes it was invasive. 11 is terrible on the looks* and the invasiveness.

    *) seriously… it looks dated and cluttered after using something like Gnome for a while

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      2000 was amazing. Constantly rebooting was a normal thing and everyone from techs to end users was fine with it, because it was normal.

      One day I was telling my bf, “This thing has been running for a month! I got 30-days uptime!”