• ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I think it’s pretty likely that without some “good principles” Torvalds would not have been able to admit his faults and begin working on them.

    I think getting upset about how he used to behave isn’t very helpful, once he’s acknowledged and apologized.

    • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      He didn’t admit his fault. He just validated his ideology and told other people that they don’t have to work with him.

      He is pretty much normalizing abusive behavior and rationalizing it by saying that he is not politically correct and that respect is earned.

        • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          Admitting something because you are called out on it is the same as apologizing for saying racist shit on tv. It is all performative and wouldnt happen if people wouldnt have made it public

          • yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            I understand your point, but there is a ton of cases where a person does not realize they did something wrong until they are called out, because they really think that what they did isn’t wrong.

          • ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            It feels a little… Calvinist to not allow for people to improve themselves over their life.

            Personally, I think it’s a good thing when someone with a reputation like Linus Torvald, or Tim Hardaway, or even George Wallace improves themself and their impact on those around them. Such improvement should be encouraged in others, not condemned as performative.

            • Spectre@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              And it feels very naive to believe that people change just because they are called out on it and they have to say so to save whatever is left of their reputation. It is even more naive to believe so when the guy hasn’t improve a tiny bit.

              Saying that he improved and we should just shut up about it just because he said so, it is literal gaslighting dressed in “just put the other cheek” masochism and giving green light to abuser just because they lie about their supposed improvement

              • ranandtoldthat@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 days ago

                I didn’t tell you told you to “shut up”, I’ve pointed out some of the the flaws/harm in your method of criticism. Others in this thread have also tried to help you understand the issue here. It’s up to you whether you choose to accept it and focus your energy on other topics. Nobody is going to force you.

                Ultimately, people do improve. Look inward. Hove you ever improved? If so, realize others can, too. Linus Torvald has, by accounts of people who know and work with him, as did the other examples I gave.

                All the best to you and yours.