• Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      They just did.

      Eating meat = a neutral action that has no moral dilemma.

      How we produce meat products = a large and complex question that does pose an ethical/moral dilemma centered around methods of production.

      How is that so hard to understand?

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Never said it was moral. I said it was specifically amoral, as in “has nothing to do with your arbitrary sense of morality”. Try reading again.

          • quips@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 month ago

            I have trouble understanding how it could be amoral. Every time you eat meat you are making the choice to contribute to crimes than the holocaust? Who, without your contribution, would have a reduced capacity to commit suffering.