The top official at the U.S. Postal Service said Thursday that the agency has stopped work on developing a controversial computer system that was central to Donald Trump’s effort to limit mail voting after the Supreme Court rejected his executive order this week.

“There’s an injunction so we’re not doing anything,” postmaster general David Steiner told The Associated Press in an interview.

Steiner, a onetime chief executive of Waste Management, has spent most of the past year atop the postal service navigating political and financial challenges. He’s pressing Congress for changes that would help him resolve what he has called a “liquidity crisis.”

And Trump’s efforts to largely eradicate mail voting turned the postal service into an unlikely arbiter of who is eligible to vote just months before this year’s critical midterm elections, a role Steiner seemingly had little interest in playing. Unlike Trump, who was sharply critical of the Supreme Court decision and ridiculed some of the justices, Steiner offered no assessment of the court’s action.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    16 hours ago

    You mean, the illegal work that is against the Constitution, right? Since the states run their elections and the feds should not be fucking around with, right?

    • Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yes that work. And so the people that are in charge, and that did that work will be prosecuted. Right!?!

  • deeprlyeh@lemmus.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Everyone needs to treat mail in voting as a lost cause and vote in person.

    They continually do whatever they want. They are going to try and lead people into false security.

    • Malica@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m more concerned about ballots not being delivered to people initially, not much we can do about that.

    • Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Everyone needs to treat mail in voting as a lost cause and vote in person.

      Not everyone has that luxury.

      • Akasazh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        18 hours ago

        That’s besides the point. If you can go in person, if you can’t that option isn’t available.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Except it’s not, people overseas can’t vote in person, and some states only do mail-in ballots. What’s your solution to that one?

            • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              15 hours ago

              When you’re one of the people who can’t physically get to the polls it’s erasure. And disenfranchisement.

              Rather than engage further with you I replied directly to them:

              Everyone needs to treat mail in voting as a lost cause and vote in person, and help those who can’t by delivering their ballots to the polling place. If possible, recruit enough individuals to each take a single extra ballot so you don’t risk being stopped for ballot stuffing.

      • veryblandusername@fedinsfw.app
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        “I was going to stop Republicans from genociding half the country but I didn’t want to take off work.”

        You’re going to lose your job regardless, may as well lose it standing up for something for once.

        • klugerama@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          11 hours ago

          That math doesn’t check out.

          There’s a 0.00000000001% chance that I will lose my job if I specifically don’t vote in person, versus a 90% chance that I will lose my job for not showing up.

          Sure, if everyone does this, it might make a difference. It still might not, and a lot of people would still get fired just for missing work regardless of the outcome.

    • Serinus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Trying to vote early and in person seems like the safest bet.

      If you wait until election day, it’s easier for them to try to delay/interfere you away from your vote.

    • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Everyone needs to treat mail in voting as a lost cause and vote in person, and help those who can’t by delivering their ballots to the polling place. If possible, recruit enough individuals to each take a single extra ballot so you don’t risk being stopped for ballot stuffing.

  • rynn@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Why would anyone believe anything the federal government and its cronies, like the postmaster general, are saying?

    There’s already been reporting by whistleblowers of the postal service saying one thing and doing another so there’s zero reason to believe anything they says.

    Vote this November like our lives depend on it, and don’t trust the postal service to get it right. No matter where you cast your ballot make sure you follow up and ensure your vote is counted.