IBM scraps rewards program for staff inventions, wipes away cash points | Big Blue staffers aren’t pleased to lose out on potential bonuses::Big Blue staffers aren’t pleased to lose out on potential bonuses

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    IBM is what a company that survived crossing to the other side of the enshittification fence looks like. They are profitable, for sure, but they have nothing of value to offer to an actual human being. They only speak corpo and their only semi-amiable relationships are with other corporate entities via contracts, negotiations, arbitration, and lawsuits. It’s functionally and physically incapable of communicating, offering a product or relating with an average real person, for they haven’t known what that is in at least three decades.

    • aname@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      IBM has always been a business-to-business. Their name literally comes from International Business Machines.

      • dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I suppose the several IBM PCs I owned in the 80s and 90s were all just hallucinations. Useful hallucinations though, they taught me to use DOS and to program in BASIC.

        • aname@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t think I claimed they don’t do consumer stuff but business stuff has always been their core business.

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          IBM wasn’t interested in PCs, and they were already enshittifyjng by then.

      • XEAL@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        A company is not necessarily limited to the activities implied by its name.

        • aname@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Did I say that? OP complained that IBM has become so business oriented recently, but that has always been its core business.

          • XEAL@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s what it sounded like and I’m not the only guy who saw it that way ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

            • aname@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              That just means more than one people jump to conclusions

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        They began that way, then they branched into personal computation when that became a thing. Then they took a machine gun to their feet in that market

        • phillaholic@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s was too much hassle for too little profit. Their bread and butter is having regular people not remember they still exist.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly this. The effort of selling one z Series is not one million times higher than selling a laptop, but the profit is.