• verysoft@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    People get way too excited for any game, should always expect a pile of shit these days and just be pleasantly surprised instead. People are die hard fans of games like CP2077 before they even release, it’s not good.

    But expectations don’t come from nowhere, a lot of the city stuff they were selling was like GTA, but the AI didn’t even release at a 2004 San Andreas level, it’s still not as good as GTA AI and that’s just people walking/driving around convincingly. GTA V itself was 7 years old when CP2077 released, it’s not surprising people were expecting a simulation of the world to be at least as good as that. I think their scope was too big, there was probs a lot of mismanagement behind the scenes. I don’t know how they spent 8 years on it and it still turned out like it did, I guess we will never know what happened. The story is the only saving grace, they should have just delayed it and tried to make it a more linear story game and just abandon any RPG-esque/open world elements that were left.

    Being critical of games is good, especially ones that completely shit the bed, defending it just leads to more of that in the future. I love BG3 for example, but it has it’s fair share of issues that I can point out every time I play it. Why would I not want better products? Why settle for less? There’s too much submissive consumerism these days.

    • bermuda@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I played through the whole game last year and while I had fun, you can definitely tell the scope is too big. There’s lots to do but when you do things, there isn’t much depth. Systems that you think should be in place just aren’t there. The game also has a lot of features that align with open world action games of the era like Ghost of Tsushima or Horizon Forbidden West. There’s stealth, there’s a crafting system, there’s collectibles and fetch quests. But there’s few features that align with most other role playing games. You cant get a bite to eat at nearly any restaurant. You can’t have a conversation with an NPC that isn’t one of the dozen that’s relevant to the story. (My favorite activity in fallout is to chat with random characters about random things.) Dialogue trees are shockingly stiff and inconsequential. Most missions have choices but it boils down to “X character is alive instead of unconscious.”

      There’s a lot more I could go into but in general it just came across like it was almost unfinished. The only mission I played that felt like a true RPG mission instead of a stealth game or a shooter was the Flathead mission, so it makes sense that’s the mission they relentlessly previewed back in 2019.

      • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed. The biggest issue for me, as a PC gamer who expected bugs at launch, was really that it’s a stealth/action game that was marketed as an RPG even though it has precious few consequential choices or playstyle options.

    • Umbrias@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      For sure. And who knows, much of that could be guerrilla marketing to stoke the hype.

      Expecting cp2077 to be anything like GTA is just silly. They are entirely different games.

      And the RPG elements are fine, it’s already very linear, and plays like you’re the focus character of a cyberpunk campaign. They did just fine on that front, so I don’t really understand your critique there.