Our results show that women’s contributions tend to be accepted more often than men’s [when their gender is hidden]. However, when a woman’s gender is identifiable, they are rejected more often. Our results suggest that although women on GitHub may be more competent overall, bias against them exists nonetheless.

  • jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    We ass-u-me too much based on people’s genders/photographs/ideas/etc., which taints our objectivity when assessing the quality of their code.

    For a close example on Lemmy: people refusing to collaborate with “tankie” devs, with no further insight on whether the code is good or not.

    There also used to be code licensed “not to be used for right wing purposes”, and similar.

    • Ava@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      That’s not an excellent example. If they refuse to collaborate with them, and also don’t make any claims about the quality of code, then the claim that their objectivity in reviewing code is tainted doesn’t hold.

      • jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Their objectivity is preempted by a subjective evaluation, just like it would be by someone’s appearance or any other perception other than the code itself.